Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="zoroaster100" data-source="post: 4410061" data-attributes="member: 8538">I ran Shackled City as DM, and our group enjoyed it a lot.  It did require some modifications to the plot and to some encounters, though.  But the Paizo boards contained many detailed insightful posts from fans and Paizo staff, with suggestions for changing the path to make it significantly better, including alternate stats for creatures and NPCs, etc., so the changes didn't even take too much work.I wanted to run Rise of the Runelords but it was vetoed by one of my players who read the first adventure and for some reason didn't like it.I then wanted to run Scales of War but the first adventure seems so poorly designed, with one or few super high level monsters for each encounter instead of multiple appropriate level monsters.  So I may borrow from it, but will not be running it.I love the Crimson Throne path, having read it with an eye to DM it.  But I will not run any more 3.5 high level adventures as DM, so the only way I'd run this is if it gets a good 4E conversion by other fans which I can use with minimal work.</blockquote>