Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="IlluminatedSeraph" data-source="post: 6771024" data-attributes="member: 6803508">With due respect, given the context of how it was brought up and the high degree of relevance to the OP's attitude toward the thread topic, pointing out that the OP is putting an extremely biased and frankly nasty spin on an aspect of his GM's identity seems highly relevant. I think that Asatania_GM and Tia Nadiezja have been very reasonable and to-the-point in their statements, especially Tia's relation of personal experience that's quite relevant to having a poly person (or people) at your table, and CapnZapp's treatment of it as some sort of off-topic diatribe about subjects best not talked about smacks heavily of erasure.The fact is that the OP's primary complaint ("most grievous of all") is that other people at the table used language at the table of which he did not approve, which given his later comment about polyamory we can quite easily read to mean casual conversation about a personal identity he doesn't approve of the existence of. We can certainly go on with discussing table limits and how to work properly with the Organizer system, and that's to the good, but calling "specifics of that sub-discussion" (could you be any more squeamish about writing around it, by the way?) not really relevant to the discussion over all seems like a very odd reading of the OP's original and subsequent posts in this thread.</blockquote>