Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="IlluminatedSeraph" data-source="post: 6771358" data-attributes="member: 6803508">@<a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/member.php?u=70203" target="_blank">skerritthegreen</a>I'm reasonably certain that we were just having a disagreement about the appropriateness of other people's comments in the thread. I'm also reasonably certain that we disagree still. But since I happen to think those people (Pauper and Tia, I'd give you more XP if I could!) did a very good job of covering why the OP's comments on poly are problematic and I've articulated why their thoughts are important to the discussion, I don't feel a burning need to add more of my own. And frankly, I would have thought the other stuff was well covered anyway, but since you seemed to urgently want to talk about everything in the OP's posts except poly, I thought I would oblige you in the interest of showing some deference to your point of view. That you chose to view that as me somehow trolling you is... honestly baffling to me. We can actually comment on the whole OP, because it's the OP - what else would the thread be about but that? The personality issues in question are obviously pretty central, but they've also been well-covered, and I probably wouldn't have posted at all if you and Capn hadn't come charging in trying to declare that what Pauper and Tia were talking about was off-topic and generally off-limits. I'm pretty sure we still honestly disagree about that, right?The fact is that yes, I think your post was out of line, and your reading was less valid because it ignored a salient issue on the basis that we somehow "can't" comment on it - as if the personalities and conversations were somehow less reliably reported than the description of the store in spite of coming from the same person. I really do think your reading is odd, considering.As for educating you, that would be off topic. Seriously, PM me if you want to go on at length with this.TLDR: Our actual point of disagreement seems to be the appropriateness and relevance of other people's posts. I've said my piece and you've said yours, so can we stop sparring with each other and let the thread continue?Addendum: It's ma'am, since you asked. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

Verification