Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="RangerWickett" data-source="post: 5747727" data-attributes="member: 63">The short answer is, 'whatever you think works best.' But (bearing in mind we published this almost 5 years ago, so the memory's a bit fuzzy) here's what I figure:It depends how the PCs spin it. If they're like, We're saving the forest, she might let them. If they just rush in to kill her, well, she'll think they're enemies and fight back. No he's not. He's a horrible tentacle monster who can disguise himself via illusions. So he could attack her.  I hadn't planned it, but that could work.Never thought about it. It probably doesn't sound as good in other languages, but if you want it to work, sure, why not? I'd have him follow the party's lead. If they fight, he'll be encouraged enough to fight. Otherwise, he might just despair and give up. I think we figured the second option. He might be convinced to leave at that point, but on his own he'd keep fighting. No, but it's a flimsy tower that a stag could knock down. I don't recall the rules, but yeah, that sounds right. If you're willing to fudge things a bit, and you think the party might overwhelm Indomitability, perhaps when the sword is pulled out, the fire within him magically pushes aside the water (which carries away anyone next to him) and hardens the lakebed, so he's able to charge straight to shore. This should mitigate any threat of peppering him with arrows while he swims to shore.</blockquote>