Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Advice on how I should multi-class
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ClaytonCross" data-source="post: 7193602" data-attributes="member: 6880599"><p>100 * .64 = 64</p><p>200 * .4 = 80</p><p></p><p>Yep numbers. Just as meaningless as yours without an explanation. Mine is less twisted because I explained that your hit % is going to change depending on the DM the enemy makes you fight. Again I am not saying your math is wrong only that you need to explain why your multiplying by .64 and .4 to your rolls or the OP (and myself) doesn't have a reasonable expectation of the context in which your "DPR" is relevant. Where I on the other stated up front that my 100% hit DPR is not reliable to determine damage alone. You seem to be trying to demonstrate additional calculations to account for accuracy but your not stating the limitations of calculation your simple stating it as fact. This extra step is bound to be right (if it is correct, which I am going to assume it is) but only with in the limit of the definition your using to make them. So my point is, my DPR is a better guideline as is, and certainly better than none, but yours could be better math that does not show its relevance because you did not list your reasoning and limits. Do that and you very well may have a better answer. Please do! I am interested to see it.</p><p></p><p>Kind of like the meaning of life is 42. Sure maybe it is, but until you tell me how you got that or under what context that is useful it is meaningless. Not saying it is wrong, just that it need elaboration.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ClaytonCross, post: 7193602, member: 6880599"] 100 * .64 = 64 200 * .4 = 80 Yep numbers. Just as meaningless as yours without an explanation. Mine is less twisted because I explained that your hit % is going to change depending on the DM the enemy makes you fight. Again I am not saying your math is wrong only that you need to explain why your multiplying by .64 and .4 to your rolls or the OP (and myself) doesn't have a reasonable expectation of the context in which your "DPR" is relevant. Where I on the other stated up front that my 100% hit DPR is not reliable to determine damage alone. You seem to be trying to demonstrate additional calculations to account for accuracy but your not stating the limitations of calculation your simple stating it as fact. This extra step is bound to be right (if it is correct, which I am going to assume it is) but only with in the limit of the definition your using to make them. So my point is, my DPR is a better guideline as is, and certainly better than none, but yours could be better math that does not show its relevance because you did not list your reasoning and limits. Do that and you very well may have a better answer. Please do! I am interested to see it. Kind of like the meaning of life is 42. Sure maybe it is, but until you tell me how you got that or under what context that is useful it is meaningless. Not saying it is wrong, just that it need elaboration. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Advice on how I should multi-class
Top