Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Advice on how to play Lawful Good not Lawful Stupid needed
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mark Chance" data-source="post: 575373" data-attributes="member: 2795"><p><strong>Not quite...</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Dirty Harry, yes. Batman, no. Batman does not, will not, kill. To take a life violates the most fundamental tenet of his personal code. Batman also works very much hand-in-hand with law enforcement, doing the things that the police cannot do because of the niceties of things like search warrants, probable cause, et cetera.</p><p></p><p>Regarding the LG monk, remember that Lawful not necessarily equate to law-abiding. Lex inuista non est lex, if I remember my Latin correctly. An unjust law is not a law. This principle has been of cardinal importance, at least in Western philosophy and theology, for something on the order of 2000+ years.</p><p></p><p>The problem that I see with regards to Lawful alignments is that too many people seem to approach the idea from a positivist point of view, which holds that man-made law is the highest law there is. This is not only demonstrably false, but is also a recipe for tyranny, whether it is the tyranny of one party (i.e., the Nazis or the Communists), of one person (i.e., Saddam Hussein), or of the majority (i.e., popular democracy).</p><p></p><p>A Lawful Good character, it seems to me, is committed to the idea that there is a Good that stands as the superior in the relationship between Lawful and Good. Consequently, laws that permit evil to occur or directly bring about evil need not be obeyed.</p><p></p><p>Of course, this doesn't mean they have to be fought against tooth and nail. An unjust law can be permissive or coercive. Permissive evil impose no moral obligation for civil disobedience. Coercive laws do.</p><p></p><p>Hand in hand with all of this remains a prime consideration: Evil has no rights, but people do.</p><p></p><p>Anyway, that's enough for one post. I need to get up and do something constructive. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mark Chance, post: 575373, member: 2795"] [b]Not quite...[/b] Dirty Harry, yes. Batman, no. Batman does not, will not, kill. To take a life violates the most fundamental tenet of his personal code. Batman also works very much hand-in-hand with law enforcement, doing the things that the police cannot do because of the niceties of things like search warrants, probable cause, et cetera. Regarding the LG monk, remember that Lawful not necessarily equate to law-abiding. Lex inuista non est lex, if I remember my Latin correctly. An unjust law is not a law. This principle has been of cardinal importance, at least in Western philosophy and theology, for something on the order of 2000+ years. The problem that I see with regards to Lawful alignments is that too many people seem to approach the idea from a positivist point of view, which holds that man-made law is the highest law there is. This is not only demonstrably false, but is also a recipe for tyranny, whether it is the tyranny of one party (i.e., the Nazis or the Communists), of one person (i.e., Saddam Hussein), or of the majority (i.e., popular democracy). A Lawful Good character, it seems to me, is committed to the idea that there is a Good that stands as the superior in the relationship between Lawful and Good. Consequently, laws that permit evil to occur or directly bring about evil need not be obeyed. Of course, this doesn't mean they have to be fought against tooth and nail. An unjust law can be permissive or coercive. Permissive evil impose no moral obligation for civil disobedience. Coercive laws do. Hand in hand with all of this remains a prime consideration: Evil has no rights, but people do. Anyway, that's enough for one post. I need to get up and do something constructive. :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Advice on how to play Lawful Good not Lawful Stupid needed
Top