Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
ShortQuests -- individual adventure modules! An all-new collection of digest-sized D&D adventures designed to plug in to your game.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
AEG's EMPIRE ... anyone have it yet?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Silveras" data-source="post: 1178493" data-attributes="member: 6271"><p>No, the <strong>late</strong> medieval church was not landless, but much of that land was donated by the faithful to the <strong>early</strong> medieval church when it <strong>was</strong> (practically) landless. Its social power (based on the devotion of the followers) grew into land-based power. Some countries passed laws forbidding the practice of leaving land to the church because the church was becoming *too* powerful (in the eyes of the rulers), and the church never died (so the crown got no inheritance taxes for land changing hands). </p><p></p><p>I am aware of Birthright 3E; I just did not initially think it relevant to a discussion of Empire. My homebrew world is described entirely in terms of Birthright: Provinces, Domains, Realms, and Holdings (Temple, Law, Source, and Guild). The reason the lack of non-landed power structures is one of my pet peeves is because I find it hard to represent the complex balance of power in that world using any other system. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> Why do I want to use a different system ? Because, on some levels, the BR system is <strong>too</strong> abstracted. But that is a different discussion. </p><p></p><p>Birthright also has rules for implementing sea power. Empire makes little mention of sea power. If you add a port to a city (you may add features to cities much like building city improvements in Civ), you get an economic benefit. There is, however, no shipbuilding industry, nor is there discussion in the mass combat rules of naval combat or boarding actions (unless I missed them). </p><p></p><p>Areas where Empire could be improved (and, while most of these are easily implemented by the DM, some are just so obvious that they should be part of ANY comprehensive discussion of Realm management): </p><p></p><ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Mineral resources are only focused on metals (copper, silver, gold, mithral, adamantine, iron); no mention of gems are made. Adding gems would not be difficult using the abstract system presented, it just should already be there.<br /> </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">While water provides food (in the form of fish, presumably), there is no discussion of resources like ivory (from whaling) that could also be used to produce trade goods. <br /> </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Ports should enable a shipbuilding industry. <br /> </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Ships should be another trading option. <br /> </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Herbs and Spices should be available as trade goods.<br /> </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Jewelry should be a trade good that can be produced using mineral resources.<br /> </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Trained or rare breed animals as a trade option, and a city improvement to enable them, should be available.<br /> </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">A discussion of alternate government forms (Theocracy, Magocracy, etc.) would have been helpful. While there is a discussion of each Core Class as King, there is no discussion of adjustments based on a government type other than Monarchy. <br /> </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Naval elements for the mass combat rules.<br /> </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Alternative sources of political power would have been nice. </li> </ol><p></p><p>Now, to be fair, Empire does many things well:</p><p></p><ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Provides a playable framework for making realm management part of the game.<br /> </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Provides a scalable system for said realm management.<br /> </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Offers excellent advice for making sure that any realm you hand to your players is viable. <br /> </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Takes into account variable unit sizes in the mass combat system. <br /> </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Covers adjusting the Base Classes to represent Kingship. <br /> </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Does a good job of handling inter-realm trade in a workable manner. <br /> </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Provides a workable mass combat system. </li> </ol></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Silveras, post: 1178493, member: 6271"] No, the [B]late[/B] medieval church was not landless, but much of that land was donated by the faithful to the [B]early[/B] medieval church when it [B]was[/B] (practically) landless. Its social power (based on the devotion of the followers) grew into land-based power. Some countries passed laws forbidding the practice of leaving land to the church because the church was becoming *too* powerful (in the eyes of the rulers), and the church never died (so the crown got no inheritance taxes for land changing hands). I am aware of Birthright 3E; I just did not initially think it relevant to a discussion of Empire. My homebrew world is described entirely in terms of Birthright: Provinces, Domains, Realms, and Holdings (Temple, Law, Source, and Guild). The reason the lack of non-landed power structures is one of my pet peeves is because I find it hard to represent the complex balance of power in that world using any other system. ;) Why do I want to use a different system ? Because, on some levels, the BR system is [B]too[/B] abstracted. But that is a different discussion. Birthright also has rules for implementing sea power. Empire makes little mention of sea power. If you add a port to a city (you may add features to cities much like building city improvements in Civ), you get an economic benefit. There is, however, no shipbuilding industry, nor is there discussion in the mass combat rules of naval combat or boarding actions (unless I missed them). Areas where Empire could be improved (and, while most of these are easily implemented by the DM, some are just so obvious that they should be part of ANY comprehensive discussion of Realm management): [list=1] [*]Mineral resources are only focused on metals (copper, silver, gold, mithral, adamantine, iron); no mention of gems are made. Adding gems would not be difficult using the abstract system presented, it just should already be there. [*]While water provides food (in the form of fish, presumably), there is no discussion of resources like ivory (from whaling) that could also be used to produce trade goods. [*]Ports should enable a shipbuilding industry. [*]Ships should be another trading option. [*]Herbs and Spices should be available as trade goods. [*]Jewelry should be a trade good that can be produced using mineral resources. [*]Trained or rare breed animals as a trade option, and a city improvement to enable them, should be available. [*]A discussion of alternate government forms (Theocracy, Magocracy, etc.) would have been helpful. While there is a discussion of each Core Class as King, there is no discussion of adjustments based on a government type other than Monarchy. [*]Naval elements for the mass combat rules. [*]Alternative sources of political power would have been nice. [/list] Now, to be fair, Empire does many things well: [list=1] [*]Provides a playable framework for making realm management part of the game. [*]Provides a scalable system for said realm management. [*]Offers excellent advice for making sure that any realm you hand to your players is viable. [*]Takes into account variable unit sizes in the mass combat system. [*]Covers adjusting the Base Classes to represent Kingship. [*]Does a good job of handling inter-realm trade in a workable manner. [*]Provides a workable mass combat system. [/list] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
AEG's EMPIRE ... anyone have it yet?
Top