Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="SteveC" data-source="post: 5799243" data-attributes="member: 9053">I voted ugh. I was initially pretty positive, but it seems like a lot of what they're discussing seems to be a return to ideas that were changed in 4E for a real reason.I think this is a good reason for people who didn't like 4E to be excited: it seems like the things I'm really positive about in 4E are going away, and we're going back to the way things used to be.I'm still very excited about the modularity concept, and I hope that I can make 5E the game I want to play. But, the concepts of greater lethality, the return of spellslots, the removal of the AEDU system, the return of saving throws, and the likely return of less interesting combat environments are nothing I'm looking for.It's still too early to see, but I heard nothing about the game that sounds anything like 4E. (Did you like any of the changes you made? Anything?) That may make a lot of people happy, but it leaves me as a sad panda.I'd like to invite Monte Cook to play in one of my game sessions of 4E. I could explain a few of the rules he has a problem with if he ever gets back to Wisconsin. And I'd love to talk about the good old days of Rolemaster...</blockquote>