Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
"Aggro"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Fanaelialae" data-source="post: 5902274" data-attributes="member: 53980"><p>I don't think that DDN should use a WoW style of aggro (more or less whoever deals the most damage gets attacked) for a number of reasons. The DM is better suited to deciding who his preferred targets are than some algorithm.</p><p></p><p>That said, I definitely think DDN should have mechanics that allow characters (fighters in particular) to incentivize enemies into attacking them (via a marking mechanic, or something similar). The reason is simple. The brave warrior who protects his charge is a classic trope of fantasy, whether you're talking about Aes Sedai and their Warders (Wheel of Time), Caramon and Raistlin, or the prototypical knight who bravely protects the royal family from harm.</p><p></p><p>It's something that, as a player, I felt was sorely lacking from D&D prior to the Knight (Player's HB 2, 3.5e). Granted, the Knight had issues on a mechanical level, but it was a step in the right direction. Marking (IMO) was another step in that direction, as it changed the Knight's Challenge (which <strong>forced</strong> an enemy to attack the Knight) into an incentive mechanic. You didn't <em>have to</em> attack the fighter, but depending on the circumstances it might be your smartest option.</p><p></p><p>Without a "marking" mechanic, assassins can just stroll past the fighter and assassinate the king he's protecting. The fighter's only chance of stopping them is to kill them before they can walk past him. Such mechanics (or in this case, a lack thereof) promote a rocket tag style of play where MOAR damage is always king, to which I say no thank you. </p><p></p><p>With a "marking" mechanic, damage is no longer the <em>only</em> thing that matters. It introduces a degree of subtlety to combat. It gives fighters control. Suddenly, the knight with a longsword and shield can have just as much of an influence upon the battlefield as the greataxe wielding barbarian. That's a good thing IMO.</p><p></p><p>Essentially, while the fighter shouldn't be guaranteed to be able to protect his charges, he should certainly have a fighting chance, assuming that's the style of fighter he wants to be.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Fanaelialae, post: 5902274, member: 53980"] I don't think that DDN should use a WoW style of aggro (more or less whoever deals the most damage gets attacked) for a number of reasons. The DM is better suited to deciding who his preferred targets are than some algorithm. That said, I definitely think DDN should have mechanics that allow characters (fighters in particular) to incentivize enemies into attacking them (via a marking mechanic, or something similar). The reason is simple. The brave warrior who protects his charge is a classic trope of fantasy, whether you're talking about Aes Sedai and their Warders (Wheel of Time), Caramon and Raistlin, or the prototypical knight who bravely protects the royal family from harm. It's something that, as a player, I felt was sorely lacking from D&D prior to the Knight (Player's HB 2, 3.5e). Granted, the Knight had issues on a mechanical level, but it was a step in the right direction. Marking (IMO) was another step in that direction, as it changed the Knight's Challenge (which [b]forced[/b] an enemy to attack the Knight) into an incentive mechanic. You didn't [i]have to[/i] attack the fighter, but depending on the circumstances it might be your smartest option. Without a "marking" mechanic, assassins can just stroll past the fighter and assassinate the king he's protecting. The fighter's only chance of stopping them is to kill them before they can walk past him. Such mechanics (or in this case, a lack thereof) promote a rocket tag style of play where MOAR damage is always king, to which I say no thank you. With a "marking" mechanic, damage is no longer the [i]only[/i] thing that matters. It introduces a degree of subtlety to combat. It gives fighters control. Suddenly, the knight with a longsword and shield can have just as much of an influence upon the battlefield as the greataxe wielding barbarian. That's a good thing IMO. Essentially, while the fighter shouldn't be guaranteed to be able to protect his charges, he should certainly have a fighting chance, assuming that's the style of fighter he wants to be. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
"Aggro"
Top