Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Maxperson" data-source="post: 9879999" data-attributes="member: 23751">It's not the same at all.  If I commission you to make a dragon, YOU are making the dragon to YOUR vision.  I might influence that vision a bit, but it's still going to be YOUR vision of what I am asking for.  AI does not have a vision, so what the final result is, is 100% MY vision, rending AI a tool and not an artist.I haven't listened to them at all.  I come up with my own arguments and reasoning.  If you reduce AI to being 100% a tool, the vision is 100% the human artist's and not the tool's.  Claiming that AI at that point is the artist is like claiming the Leonardo da Vinci's paintbrush was the artist.  He couldn't have painted the Mona Lisa without tools to help him achieve his vision, either.You guys are letting your hatred of AI "created" art cloud your thinking about AI used only as a tool.  There's a huge difference between the first and second methods in my first post in the thread.</blockquote>