Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Gorgon Zee" data-source="post: 9882853" data-attributes="member: 75787">So, this is just not how AI art works. If it built an image for which you specified every pixel exactly, then your argument would have merit. However, you would not be using an AI because -- by definition -- they are using intelligence, not "just following direction".Your prompt for the engine is a fraction of the input that goes into creating the image. The majority of the information in the generated picture is defined by the model itself. Are you a part of the creative process? Of course! But no more so than someone who gives a detailed description of a picture they want a human artist to draw.Take your prompt for an image -- if you gave that to a human artists and they drew it exactly as you said, no one would doubt, morally and legally, that they were the creator. So it makes no sense for you to claim that simply by giving the same instructions to a computer, suddenly you become the creator.Now, as all artists know, a client who is good at describing what they need is a great asset -- we're not knocking your ability to describe what you want done -- but it doesn't make you the creator. It makes you a good describer.</blockquote>