Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
ShortQuests -- individual adventure modules! An all-new collection of digest-sized D&D adventures designed to plug in to your game.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Maxperson" data-source="post: 9886462" data-attributes="member: 23751">Sort of like an axe, sword and saw, but all three are sharp tools.  It doesn't matter if they have different names, they still all function as a form of automation.Not really.  For example, I have a really good intuitive grasp of what looks good. I can't draw it, but I could get there via directing someone else.  Maybe that's intuitive skill. <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" alt="🤷‍♂️" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f937-2642.png" title="Man shrugging    :man_shrugging:" data-shortname=":man_shrugging:" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" />That's what they would be volunteering to be.  It's not something I would ever do or expect someone else to agree to do, but it was your hypothetical.Edit: Two things. First, the whole comparison of a living artist to a machine tool like AI is a False Equivalence(An AI isn't a person or artist) and a Red Herring.  It's nothing more than a distraction from the real discussion. Second, nobody is going to do your hypothetical.  A person with the creative idea isn't going go to an artist, direct him every step of the way, and let the artist control the creation, so it simply won't be done.  That or the person with the creative idea will talk a friend who is willing to let the creative person also have control of the final product, or pay the artist for the final product.  Nobody is going to be treated like a slave in this distraction hypothetical of yours.</blockquote>

Verification