Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Justice and Rule" data-source="post: 9886587" data-attributes="member: 6778210">Am I making an assumption when your response to me was citing what Claude said?I didn't say that it agreed with my stance. Once again, you are so focused on "winning an argument" that you completely misunderstand why I said one should read it: I found it interesting. It's an engagement with the idea of your "literary property" as a natural right, how that would function, what are the potentially problematic interactions, and how it could be brought about. It's a very interesting piece, but here you are trying to act like it is hiding something that is rather bluntly exclaimed and explained in the piece as being "hidden away" in a footnote. I like it because it has more cites and sources about the topic, interesting quotes, and ideas on how it would actually function.Again, I assert that you don't seem to have read the piece because you clearly don't understand what the author set forth in the introduction.She's not really saying what it should do, but rather exploring the concept of literary property, how it relates and interacts with the idea of copyright, the problems with it, and how one could implement it.Like, just read this:Edit: Eh, she is more prescriptive with her conclusion, but at any rate I find it all to be pretty well-reasoned and her counter-arguments from 547 to 552 to be interesting.</blockquote>