Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="LuisCarlos17f" data-source="post: 9886905" data-attributes="member: 6802378">I have looked for more information and we have got the example of the artwork "A Single Piece of American Cheese" but we have got also the cases  Zarya of the Dawn (2023) (Graphic novelist Kristina Kashtanova used Midjourney to generate images. USCO protected the text, selection, coordination, and overall arrangement of the images (as a compilation), but not the individual AI-generated images. The human labor involved in the assembly and structure was deemed sufficient to grant partial protection) and the case in China Li vs. Liu (2023)A work assisted by AI can be protected by copyright. I believe this detail is an important distinction. I suppose professional artists will take care of recording evidence of their own creative contribution.My opinion is that AI will paradoxically boost creativity because it will be used by amateurs for amateur works who have very creative minds but are too clumsy to put those ideas into practice. But this saturation of creativity ultimately leads to only the freshest and most original ideas remaining in our memory.I highly doubt AI will be used for overly photorealistic images with human characters due to the risk of the uncanny valley, but we could see many works with a 2D art aesthetic.And personally, I enjoyed creating and publishing my PC species ideas althought the power level wasn't right.</blockquote>