Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Sacrosanct" data-source="post: 9225979" data-attributes="member: 15700">You were the one to come into this thread calling other people hysterical. It wasn't just me who thought you were being smug about it, so I find it a bit rich that you'd accuse me of being unreasonable when all I did was point out how literally the founder of MidJourney disproved your point.&nbsp; You can reply or not reply, but let's be honest at least. You not only said you were going to do something, but you directly asked me how I would react to you doing something. Don't blame me with ironic accusations of not arguing in good faith as an reason to not provide what you said you would provide. As far as it looks to me, you came into this thread repeating a debunked claim I've seen all too often and insulted people who are upset about this topic, and when called on it by citing an actual expert refuting your claim, are trying to shift the problem as one I'm creating. If that's not true, then please clarify.&nbsp; Why would you come into this thread calling people hysterical? What were you expected to get with that?Do you know what's unfun? Someone coming into a discussion where people are legitimately upset about something and being told they are hysterical, especially when that person is just wrong with their assumption. Cuz that never gets old, and happens with each and every one of these discussions. I can only speak for myself of course, but I'd bet dollars to donuts that artists out there are just fed up and tired of being told they aren't rational on this AI topic by people who have no idea how it works or being utilized in every freaking conversation about it.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Sacrosanct, post: 9225979, member: 15700"] You were the one to come into this thread calling other people hysterical. It wasn't just me who thought you were being smug about it, so I find it a bit rich that you'd accuse me of being unreasonable when all I did was point out how literally the founder of MidJourney disproved your point. You can reply or not reply, but let's be honest at least. You not only said you were going to do something, but you directly asked me how I would react to you doing something. Don't blame me with ironic accusations of not arguing in good faith as an reason to not provide what you said you would provide. As far as it looks to me, you came into this thread repeating a debunked claim I've seen all too often and insulted people who are upset about this topic, and when called on it by citing an actual expert refuting your claim, are trying to shift the problem as one I'm creating. If that's not true, then please clarify. Why would you come into this thread calling people hysterical? What were you expected to get with that? Do you know what's unfun? Someone coming into a discussion where people are legitimately upset about something and being told they are hysterical, especially when that person is just wrong with their assumption. Cuz that never gets old, and happens with each and every one of these discussions. I can only speak for myself of course, but I'd bet dollars to donuts that artists out there are just fed up and tired of being told they aren't rational on this AI topic by people who have no idea how it works or being utilized in every freaking conversation about it. [/QUOTE]

Verification