Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
AI is going to hack us.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ruin Explorer" data-source="post: 9654267" data-attributes="member: 18"><p>We were already not teaching people how to think - that's the key problem and part of why AI has been such a big hit.</p><p></p><p>Across the West (and in the East too), we've seen a decline in the value put on critical thinking and analysis skills, and it was never super-high, even when it peaked in probably the early 1970s. And that decline isn't just in educational curriculums and so on, but across the culture as a whole. News, particularly, has found that people would rather be told how to think about an issue than encouraged to think about an issue critically. Hell, people will literally change channel or newspaper to find one that tells them how to think (c.f. The Times in the UK for example, possibly the most contemptuous "This is how you must think" paper in Britain, and I'm including the Mail in that!). And worse, completely fake and dishonest "balance" has lead even well-meaning news channels into just pushing absolute drivel as if it were on-par with science or logic. Laws and political systems are treated as if they're inconveniences to emotion-based goals, and if anyone tries to have a reasoned opinion or show the slightest nuance or complex, they're given short shrift, because emotion-based stuff, often completely irrational and obviously false, gets more views, and most interviewers seem to prefer worthless soundbites over substantive interviews/comments.</p><p></p><p>Frankly it's shocking we've lasted this long when much of our own media are basically trying to make us as stupid and emotional as possible, and refuse to hold politicians and corporate spokespeople and so on to account, because they might require some effort and would get fewer views than just letting them spew nonsense.</p><p></p><p>AI obviously has the potential to compound this issue, but I'm not sure it's as big of a change as you're suggesting. I think it's even possible it'll actually turn out that future generations use it more responsibly, having grown up with it, than current ones do. Not that there won't be problems in the meantime.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ruin Explorer, post: 9654267, member: 18"] We were already not teaching people how to think - that's the key problem and part of why AI has been such a big hit. Across the West (and in the East too), we've seen a decline in the value put on critical thinking and analysis skills, and it was never super-high, even when it peaked in probably the early 1970s. And that decline isn't just in educational curriculums and so on, but across the culture as a whole. News, particularly, has found that people would rather be told how to think about an issue than encouraged to think about an issue critically. Hell, people will literally change channel or newspaper to find one that tells them how to think (c.f. The Times in the UK for example, possibly the most contemptuous "This is how you must think" paper in Britain, and I'm including the Mail in that!). And worse, completely fake and dishonest "balance" has lead even well-meaning news channels into just pushing absolute drivel as if it were on-par with science or logic. Laws and political systems are treated as if they're inconveniences to emotion-based goals, and if anyone tries to have a reasoned opinion or show the slightest nuance or complex, they're given short shrift, because emotion-based stuff, often completely irrational and obviously false, gets more views, and most interviewers seem to prefer worthless soundbites over substantive interviews/comments. Frankly it's shocking we've lasted this long when much of our own media are basically trying to make us as stupid and emotional as possible, and refuse to hold politicians and corporate spokespeople and so on to account, because they might require some effort and would get fewer views than just letting them spew nonsense. AI obviously has the potential to compound this issue, but I'm not sure it's as big of a change as you're suggesting. I think it's even possible it'll actually turn out that future generations use it more responsibly, having grown up with it, than current ones do. Not that there won't be problems in the meantime. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
AI is going to hack us.
Top