Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Alchemical item bonus to hit
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AbdulAlhazred" data-source="post: 5584312" data-attributes="member: 82106"><p>Nothing wrong with it, but it is a rather limited use thing, you can't really seriously say "Alchemical items are fine because this one (ok 2) race(s) can get a bonus to use them". It is something to consider, but see below.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I am probably being unclear:</p><p></p><p>When I say buffs I mean buffs to attacks or similar things that enhance the party's attacks in some way. When I say debuffs I mean debuffs to the monsters which favor the players, which are fairly close to the same thing, but there is an important difference:</p><p></p><p>Virtually all buffs to attacks will NOT WORK with Alchemical items. If the buff is to the character it has no effect, the item is making the attack, not the PC. If the buff is a general party-wide buff it is ambiguous. Again the item is making the attack. Is an item a member of the party? Is it eligible to receive these kinds of buffs? This hasn't ever been clarified. I'll grant that in general this will be the way it is going to be run, but the point stands in general, AT LEAST half of all buffs are not useful. Debuff to the monsters OTOH are going to be more useful. </p><p></p><p>Now, there's a flip side to this. A debuff to the PC won't affect his alchemical item attacks. That could be useful in some limited situations. So overall Alchemical items mostly on balance just miss out on a subset of buffs. Still those are a common type of buff and it can be problematic. It certainly doesn't contribute to the functionality of these items.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yeah, I just don't believe that a 'backup' type item is something you would want to rate feats, items, themes, and PPs much on. People have much better things to spend those on than "hey, maybe in the 3 cases per tier when I'm in this odd situation I'm going to use Alchemy, so I better spend a feat on it..." People already jealously horde bonuses of all types that work for them all the time and constantly wish they had more. Very few players are going to drop the Alchemist theme on their character or grab Alchemy Gloves for that one oddball situation.</p><p></p><p>So I agree with you about the times that these things are used. I just observe that those are not situations people are going to spend ANY resources optimizing, even if you're a warforged or a shard mind you're quite unlikely to get a launcher. Obviously there is going to be the guy that will make his character an optimized alchemist, but that's a bit of a different situation (and as alchemy items are now not really a very effective option, though fun). </p><p></p><p>So I still say at least make the things pretty accurate, commensurate with other 'backup weapon' type attacks. Consider, a fighter can toss a Javelin and at level one will get +6 (with an 18 STR), or toss some alchemical item at +3. It may be worth it, but then remember that the Javelin marks and costs almost nothing to throw, an alchemical fire or whatnot is less accurate, doesn't mark, may miss out on some buffs, and on top of all that costs a modest amount of gold.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AbdulAlhazred, post: 5584312, member: 82106"] Nothing wrong with it, but it is a rather limited use thing, you can't really seriously say "Alchemical items are fine because this one (ok 2) race(s) can get a bonus to use them". It is something to consider, but see below. I am probably being unclear: When I say buffs I mean buffs to attacks or similar things that enhance the party's attacks in some way. When I say debuffs I mean debuffs to the monsters which favor the players, which are fairly close to the same thing, but there is an important difference: Virtually all buffs to attacks will NOT WORK with Alchemical items. If the buff is to the character it has no effect, the item is making the attack, not the PC. If the buff is a general party-wide buff it is ambiguous. Again the item is making the attack. Is an item a member of the party? Is it eligible to receive these kinds of buffs? This hasn't ever been clarified. I'll grant that in general this will be the way it is going to be run, but the point stands in general, AT LEAST half of all buffs are not useful. Debuff to the monsters OTOH are going to be more useful. Now, there's a flip side to this. A debuff to the PC won't affect his alchemical item attacks. That could be useful in some limited situations. So overall Alchemical items mostly on balance just miss out on a subset of buffs. Still those are a common type of buff and it can be problematic. It certainly doesn't contribute to the functionality of these items. Yeah, I just don't believe that a 'backup' type item is something you would want to rate feats, items, themes, and PPs much on. People have much better things to spend those on than "hey, maybe in the 3 cases per tier when I'm in this odd situation I'm going to use Alchemy, so I better spend a feat on it..." People already jealously horde bonuses of all types that work for them all the time and constantly wish they had more. Very few players are going to drop the Alchemist theme on their character or grab Alchemy Gloves for that one oddball situation. So I agree with you about the times that these things are used. I just observe that those are not situations people are going to spend ANY resources optimizing, even if you're a warforged or a shard mind you're quite unlikely to get a launcher. Obviously there is going to be the guy that will make his character an optimized alchemist, but that's a bit of a different situation (and as alchemy items are now not really a very effective option, though fun). So I still say at least make the things pretty accurate, commensurate with other 'backup weapon' type attacks. Consider, a fighter can toss a Javelin and at level one will get +6 (with an 18 STR), or toss some alchemical item at +3. It may be worth it, but then remember that the Javelin marks and costs almost nothing to throw, an alchemical fire or whatnot is less accurate, doesn't mark, may miss out on some buffs, and on top of all that costs a modest amount of gold. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Alchemical item bonus to hit
Top