Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Stormborn" data-source="post: 1842027" data-attributes="member: 14041">Just discovered that Monte Cook has already done a numerical gauage of the allignment system as written in Book of Hallowed Might.&nbsp; I think I would tweek it a bit, mainly the definitions, but it seems to work.&nbsp; I will run it past Raef when I see her.The added level of complexity is indeed the issue. Still not sure what we may decided to do about it.&nbsp; Ultimatelly the problem is that, while a numerical grid gives you a finer tuned system, you still have a very quantified and discreet system of morality, if you are A you are good if you are B you are bad.&nbsp; Doesn't matter if you are using numbers or the alignments as written.That and I figured out that given the system described in my first post you get 400 possible varities of LG, LE, CG, and CE.&nbsp; Only 20 each of LN,CN, NG, and NE. and only 1 true N.&nbsp; Thus 1681 allignments instead of 9.In the Monte Cook system N is not used, but each of C, L, E, and G have a 1-9 scale in which and 1s are basically Neutral for purposes of determining allignment rules issues.more thought is needed.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Stormborn, post: 1842027, member: 14041"] Just discovered that Monte Cook has already done a numerical gauage of the allignment system as written in Book of Hallowed Might. I think I would tweek it a bit, mainly the definitions, but it seems to work. I will run it past Raef when I see her. The added level of complexity is indeed the issue. Still not sure what we may decided to do about it. Ultimatelly the problem is that, while a numerical grid gives you a finer tuned system, you still have a very quantified and discreet system of morality, if you are A you are good if you are B you are bad. Doesn't matter if you are using numbers or the alignments as written. That and I figured out that given the system described in my first post you get 400 possible varities of LG, LE, CG, and CE. Only 20 each of LN,CN, NG, and NE. and only 1 true N. Thus 1681 allignments instead of 9. In the Monte Cook system N is not used, but each of C, L, E, and G have a 1-9 scale in which and 1s are basically Neutral for purposes of determining allignment rules issues. more thought is needed. [/QUOTE]

Verification