Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Alignment change - Playing Evil
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Al" data-source="post: 812470" data-attributes="member: 2486"><p>Ranillon- You either misinterpret or misrepresent me.</p><p></p><p>Essentially, my core point was not that chaotic people had no values per se, but that their values were based on two core tenets: firstly, that the fundamental tenets held on society are not inherently better than anyone else's; and secondly, that these values are more important to be bound by 'law'.</p><p></p><p>In the first instance, this is not to say that the character necessarily disagrees with the values espoused by his society- but that he agrees with them only if he independently comes to his own conclusion that they are right. A CG character may independently comes to the conclusion that a liberal democracy is the best form of government in today's society; whilst a LN character may support it simply because it is the status quo. </p><p></p><p>Secondly, the values are not proscribed by 'law'. This is not to say that chaotics cannot think in the long-term. CG needn't be a crazy zealot who is shot to pieces by the overlord's archers whilst he tries to storm the keep; nor need CE necessarily be executed for fireballing the marketplace. Yet the fact is that they place no inherent value on 'law'. If the CG character sees that the long-term good could be achieved better by breaking laws and codes, he is more likely to take that option; if the CE character sees his long-term interest benefits from breaking the law, he will take that option. However, they will not necessarily take the option simply because it is there (unless on the extreme ends of CN). </p><p></p><p>However, the interesting attitude is CN. CN comes most closely towards Umbran's interpretation of chaotic (which I believe unsuitable to CG and CE). CG and CE both have a moral long-term goal: the betterment of society or the self. Yet CN has no such 'moral' goal- his desire to rebel against society first and foremost because that is his desire. Of course, CN can be tempered- but pure CN rebels purely for the act of rebelling.</p><p></p><p>This, is my mind, is the core difference between CG/E and CN.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Al, post: 812470, member: 2486"] Ranillon- You either misinterpret or misrepresent me. Essentially, my core point was not that chaotic people had no values per se, but that their values were based on two core tenets: firstly, that the fundamental tenets held on society are not inherently better than anyone else's; and secondly, that these values are more important to be bound by 'law'. In the first instance, this is not to say that the character necessarily disagrees with the values espoused by his society- but that he agrees with them only if he independently comes to his own conclusion that they are right. A CG character may independently comes to the conclusion that a liberal democracy is the best form of government in today's society; whilst a LN character may support it simply because it is the status quo. Secondly, the values are not proscribed by 'law'. This is not to say that chaotics cannot think in the long-term. CG needn't be a crazy zealot who is shot to pieces by the overlord's archers whilst he tries to storm the keep; nor need CE necessarily be executed for fireballing the marketplace. Yet the fact is that they place no inherent value on 'law'. If the CG character sees that the long-term good could be achieved better by breaking laws and codes, he is more likely to take that option; if the CE character sees his long-term interest benefits from breaking the law, he will take that option. However, they will not necessarily take the option simply because it is there (unless on the extreme ends of CN). However, the interesting attitude is CN. CN comes most closely towards Umbran's interpretation of chaotic (which I believe unsuitable to CG and CE). CG and CE both have a moral long-term goal: the betterment of society or the self. Yet CN has no such 'moral' goal- his desire to rebel against society first and foremost because that is his desire. Of course, CN can be tempered- but pure CN rebels purely for the act of rebelling. This, is my mind, is the core difference between CG/E and CN. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Alignment change - Playing Evil
Top