Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Kae'Yoss" data-source="post: 1028163" data-attributes="member: 4134">Re: Re: Re: I say...It's really the nature of the paladin that holds him to that moral standard.Again, it's their paladin-ness that holds them to that. Paladins have to be lawful good, and the patron deity doesn't change that (some even adapt to that: Sune accepts Paladins even though she is chaotic good). Why would he grant spells to a lawful good cleric? It's because of the one-step rule. All helm really cares about is law. As long as his worshippers are lawful, he accepts them, not caring if they are good or evil. He's not for any of those concepts, but he's not really against it. A chaotic good god, on the other side, actually is against law, and therefore woudln't accept paladins (except Sune, who has them. I think she was jealous of all those dashing boys and girls not worshipping her. You know how spurned lovers can be. And a spurned love goddess......). Corellon Larethian, for example, wouldn't want to force his subjects to obay such a harsh code of conduct. It's not right for elves, and he has to know. So he doesn't have Paladins. He does have divine champions (who can be of any alignment), and for elves, bladesingers are the thing anyway.</blockquote>