Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Alignment in the movie "Man on Fire"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Amal Shukup" data-source="post: 2172112" data-attributes="member: 6291"><p>Yes it does break down in places, but (IMNSHO) were it less structured or less, well, 'Lawful' it would break down in even more horrible ways...</p><p></p><p>We're veering into dangerous territory here, but...</p><p></p><p>The reason law enforcement agencies are typically forbidden - and SHOULD be forbidden - from using torture 'as a means to an end' is becaus the discretion of even well-meaning (and how do you continue to ensure that?) individuals and institutions are simply NOT to be trusted.</p><p></p><p>There's a scene in another excellent Movie - LA Confidential - where The Police Captain (James Cromwell) asks Dudley a couple of interesting questions - putatively on the subject of using questionable means in the furtherance of 'good' causes:</p><p></p><p style="margin-left: 20px">1. "Would you be willing to plant corroborative evidence on a suspect you <strong>knew to be guilty</strong>, in order to ensure an indictment?"</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">2. "Would you be willing to beat a confession out of a suspect you <strong>knew to be guilty</strong>?"</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">3. "Would you be willing to shoot a hardened criminal in the back, in order to offset the chance that some...lawyer..."</p><p></p><p>To which Dudley (being Lawful Good IMHO) says No, no and no...</p><p></p><p>Watching a movie like Man on Fire - We KNOW the baddies are baddies. We KNOW this, and it feels great to see the protagonist mete out punishment and take extreme steps in the furtherance of an obviously 'good cause'. Coerced confessions (using torture), planting evidence and the like are rather common in our fiction (Dirty Harry? Yeesh!), but it's a LOT less fun in reality.</p><p></p><p>Why?</p><p></p><p>Because approximately <strong>1/2 of all arrests turn out to be the wrong guy</strong>. And NONE of them were arrested because the cops thought they were innocent... This isn't (usually) cops and prosecuters acting in bad faith. This isn't 'they got off on a technicality', either. We're talking honest 'mistakes' where the evidence seems to point one way and they arrest some poor, unlucky idiot who was in the wrong place at the wrong time lookin' all guilty an all. In a way, it's just the system doing it's thing...</p><p></p><p><strong>Mostly</strong>, the system works as it should and these people get released - often with their reputations/lives irreparably damaged (because they wouldn't have gotten arrested if they weren't guilty, right?), but at least alive and in reasonably good health. In some horrible cases, they get convicted and sentenced despite the FACT (proven much, much later) that they WERE NOT the guilty party.</p><p></p><p>This sucks enough as it is, but imagine if our system(s) ALLOWED law enforcement (or - yikes! - Vigilantes!) to use torture on 'suspects' - because, of course, we all KNOW they're guilty...</p><p></p><p>What a bloody nightmare that would be. Why bother being a law abiding citizen if being innocent doesn't protect you from having your bits cut off until you confess? Think about what that does to society - given that 1/2 the time the guy getting cut up doesn't even HAVE the answers the cops are looking for (although trying like heck to make 'em up now).</p><p></p><p>So. It looks/feels good when Clint and Denzel stuff some creep in the hurt locker, and it feels pretty crappy watching some scumbag 'get away' with something (but do we really KNOW what we think we know?), BUT: Imagine if half the people Dirty Harry smacked around, or Creasy de-fingered/shot/immolated were just plain Not Guilty? Ick.</p><p></p><p>What if some cop somehow gets it in their head that WE'RE a baddy (perhaps because they just tortured some other poor sucker - who named you/me/us because he HAD to name <strong>somebody</strong> or lose another nut he was fond of...).</p><p></p><p><em>"...Yeah, ow, and they're well-known satanists too - because they play that D&D thing... Yeah, those freaks are up to something pretty sinister in there. And I think I saw them recruiting that missing person into their 'coven'... Ow!" </em></p><p></p><p>I still maintain that Creasy (in Man on Fire) is a Lawful personality because of the structured way he approaches his mission and his sense of duty. This Does NOT mean that I ascribe to his concept of law or that I think his methods are appropriate in the administration of society's laws...</p><p></p><p>Tempting though it may get from time to time...</p><p></p><p>A'Mal</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Amal Shukup, post: 2172112, member: 6291"] Yes it does break down in places, but (IMNSHO) were it less structured or less, well, 'Lawful' it would break down in even more horrible ways... We're veering into dangerous territory here, but... The reason law enforcement agencies are typically forbidden - and SHOULD be forbidden - from using torture 'as a means to an end' is becaus the discretion of even well-meaning (and how do you continue to ensure that?) individuals and institutions are simply NOT to be trusted. There's a scene in another excellent Movie - LA Confidential - where The Police Captain (James Cromwell) asks Dudley a couple of interesting questions - putatively on the subject of using questionable means in the furtherance of 'good' causes: [INDENT]1. "Would you be willing to plant corroborative evidence on a suspect you [B]knew to be guilty[/B], in order to ensure an indictment?" 2. "Would you be willing to beat a confession out of a suspect you [B]knew to be guilty[/B]?" 3. "Would you be willing to shoot a hardened criminal in the back, in order to offset the chance that some...lawyer..."[/INDENT] To which Dudley (being Lawful Good IMHO) says No, no and no... Watching a movie like Man on Fire - We KNOW the baddies are baddies. We KNOW this, and it feels great to see the protagonist mete out punishment and take extreme steps in the furtherance of an obviously 'good cause'. Coerced confessions (using torture), planting evidence and the like are rather common in our fiction (Dirty Harry? Yeesh!), but it's a LOT less fun in reality. Why? Because approximately [B]1/2 of all arrests turn out to be the wrong guy[/B]. And NONE of them were arrested because the cops thought they were innocent... This isn't (usually) cops and prosecuters acting in bad faith. This isn't 'they got off on a technicality', either. We're talking honest 'mistakes' where the evidence seems to point one way and they arrest some poor, unlucky idiot who was in the wrong place at the wrong time lookin' all guilty an all. In a way, it's just the system doing it's thing... [B]Mostly[/B], the system works as it should and these people get released - often with their reputations/lives irreparably damaged (because they wouldn't have gotten arrested if they weren't guilty, right?), but at least alive and in reasonably good health. In some horrible cases, they get convicted and sentenced despite the FACT (proven much, much later) that they WERE NOT the guilty party. This sucks enough as it is, but imagine if our system(s) ALLOWED law enforcement (or - yikes! - Vigilantes!) to use torture on 'suspects' - because, of course, we all KNOW they're guilty... What a bloody nightmare that would be. Why bother being a law abiding citizen if being innocent doesn't protect you from having your bits cut off until you confess? Think about what that does to society - given that 1/2 the time the guy getting cut up doesn't even HAVE the answers the cops are looking for (although trying like heck to make 'em up now). So. It looks/feels good when Clint and Denzel stuff some creep in the hurt locker, and it feels pretty crappy watching some scumbag 'get away' with something (but do we really KNOW what we think we know?), BUT: Imagine if half the people Dirty Harry smacked around, or Creasy de-fingered/shot/immolated were just plain Not Guilty? Ick. What if some cop somehow gets it in their head that WE'RE a baddy (perhaps because they just tortured some other poor sucker - who named you/me/us because he HAD to name [B]somebody[/B] or lose another nut he was fond of...). [I]"...Yeah, ow, and they're well-known satanists too - because they play that D&D thing... Yeah, those freaks are up to something pretty sinister in there. And I think I saw them recruiting that missing person into their 'coven'... Ow!" [/I] I still maintain that Creasy (in Man on Fire) is a Lawful personality because of the structured way he approaches his mission and his sense of duty. This Does NOT mean that I ascribe to his concept of law or that I think his methods are appropriate in the administration of society's laws... Tempting though it may get from time to time... A'Mal [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Alignment in the movie "Man on Fire"
Top