Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Thunderfoot" data-source="post: 3518027" data-attributes="member: 34175">Maybe - but then again, a paladin kills for a living too; what are the circumstances?To slay another is usually a chaotic act, but to do so as a term of employment, soldier for instance, is lawful (obey commands of a higher authority).&nbsp; To slay another is usually evil, but to execute a criminal is patently good.&nbsp; To steal from one is choatic, but not neccessarily evil, qv Robin Hood.Conan has many facets and as a DM I would adivse the character to choose Chaotic Neutral (personal gain above all other things (ie selfish)) or Chaotic Good (with Neutral tendancies) as often times he has the best intrest of others in mind as well, but cares not how they are served.&nbsp; It is the narrow minded approach and 'draconian' interprutation of which I speak.&nbsp; If done correctly and played as morals are in real life, by situation not set in stone, then they are an intregal part of the game.&nbsp; Follow?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Thunderfoot, post: 3518027, member: 34175"] Maybe - but then again, a paladin kills for a living too; what are the circumstances? To slay another is usually a chaotic act, but to do so as a term of employment, soldier for instance, is lawful (obey commands of a higher authority). To slay another is usually evil, but to execute a criminal is patently good. To steal from one is choatic, but not neccessarily evil, qv Robin Hood. Conan has many facets and as a DM I would adivse the character to choose Chaotic Neutral (personal gain above all other things (ie selfish)) or Chaotic Good (with Neutral tendancies) as often times he has the best intrest of others in mind as well, but cares not how they are served. It is the narrow minded approach and 'draconian' interprutation of which I speak. If done correctly and played as morals are in real life, by situation not set in stone, then they are an intregal part of the game. Follow? [/QUOTE]

Verification