Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Alignment myths?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celebrim" data-source="post: 3290810" data-attributes="member: 4937"><p>Before I get into a lengthy answer of that, I should point out that what happens in a mortal court of law doesn't serve as an adequate standard for what is a good or evil act. There are several problems. One, the law doesn't prosecute people for whether their intention was good or evil, but whether or not they did, and whether or not it was thier intention to obey the law. And act is unlawful under the law, even if you did not intend to break the law. Try arguing with the court over the fact that you did not intend to speed and therefore are not guilty, and see how far that gets you? But how the law operates isn't a good analogy there either, because the morality of an act is not what the law determines but rather the legality (which might be the same thing if you are LN). Secondly, the law is written by mortal and flawed agents of limited wisdom and power, and as such it is implicit in the law that the agents of the law will restrain thier judgement as is appropriate for thier limited wisdom. So for example, there may be all sorts of actions which are evil which a law refrains from prosecuting, because in the limited wisdom and power of the court to use the blunt instument of the law might cause more evil than it prevents. It may well be that any action which leads to evil is evil regardless of intent or distance removed from the first cause, but the fact that the court refrains from seeking out distant causes and cases where a mortal could reasonably say he didn't know that his action would cause evil does not in itself prove that the act is not evil. It simply suggests that the court is aware that mortal wisdom is limited and that the judge himself, being less than perfectly righteous, has no standing to pass judgement in such cases.</p><p></p><p>Does that make sense, even if you don't necessarily agree?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celebrim, post: 3290810, member: 4937"] Before I get into a lengthy answer of that, I should point out that what happens in a mortal court of law doesn't serve as an adequate standard for what is a good or evil act. There are several problems. One, the law doesn't prosecute people for whether their intention was good or evil, but whether or not they did, and whether or not it was thier intention to obey the law. And act is unlawful under the law, even if you did not intend to break the law. Try arguing with the court over the fact that you did not intend to speed and therefore are not guilty, and see how far that gets you? But how the law operates isn't a good analogy there either, because the morality of an act is not what the law determines but rather the legality (which might be the same thing if you are LN). Secondly, the law is written by mortal and flawed agents of limited wisdom and power, and as such it is implicit in the law that the agents of the law will restrain thier judgement as is appropriate for thier limited wisdom. So for example, there may be all sorts of actions which are evil which a law refrains from prosecuting, because in the limited wisdom and power of the court to use the blunt instument of the law might cause more evil than it prevents. It may well be that any action which leads to evil is evil regardless of intent or distance removed from the first cause, but the fact that the court refrains from seeking out distant causes and cases where a mortal could reasonably say he didn't know that his action would cause evil does not in itself prove that the act is not evil. It simply suggests that the court is aware that mortal wisdom is limited and that the judge himself, being less than perfectly righteous, has no standing to pass judgement in such cases. Does that make sense, even if you don't necessarily agree? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Alignment myths?
Top