Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="kreynolds" data-source="post: 281337" data-attributes="member: 2829">Honestly, what kind of example you think their characters should be setting doesn't have much bearing on alignment. As long as they're playing their alignments, there's no problem.Says who? Besides, there was nothing random in the rogue's actions. They were cold, yes; calculated, yes; effecient, yes; evil, no.Of course they wouldn't agree. Know why?They're GOOD.That depends on the guy that hit me and how many witnesses are standing around at the time.That's awfully presumptuous. You don't know what I would do. You also don't know what your player's would do. If I or your players do something that you thought we wouldn't do doesn't make it wrong or evil either.He would never say that. Know why? You asked him why he cut their throats out of game. He responded out of game. Out of game responses very rarely hold up in game.Perhaps. After all, in most territories, murder is murder anyways.There is absolutely nothing wrong with that. Now if they were "Lawful", that would be different.I think so. Try being a little more liberal instead of literal. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>