Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="NotAYakk" data-source="post: 8770142" data-attributes="member: 72555">The NG would consider the law and obeying it to have some value, and would consider directly opposing the law to be a possible problem.The people enforcing the law are also trying to do good, and them attacking your friend is understandable.The CG would consider the law unimportant noise, and consider directly opposing it to be a good thing -- those rigid rules corrupt people trying to do good and fool them into doing harm.  People attacking their friend because their friend broke the law are doing a bad thing; your friend won't be killing innocents later and meant no harm when they did it.The LG would consider someone opposing the law due to a personal connection a sign that the personal connection corrupted them and made them bad.Lawful considers rules and systems trump personal relationships.  In extreme, personal relationships corrupt.Chaos considers personal relationships trump rules and systems.  In extreme, rules and systems corrupt.These are both reasonable positions, unlike the "Chaos means any rules anywhere must be opposed and dismantled!", which reads more like oppositional defiant disorder.  And it also defines Chaos as anti-Law.If you do the same for Law, we have "Chaos means doing whatever you want" and anti-Chaos is "Law means you can't do anything".  Which is, honestly, equally ridiculous.</blockquote>