Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Alignment. Who needs it?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Liolel" data-source="post: 1507653" data-attributes="member: 1766"><p>Alingment is a fine system as long as it's remembered that alingment is based on your characters actions not the other way around. This means that if your playing a lg fighter but in the end you don't want to play a lawful character, you just need to start playing your character differently, maybe come up with a small roleplaying reason for the change (your character in gaining experince has found out that his lifestyle does not suit him, and starts shifting towards a more free lifestyle.) As your actions change a dm should shift your alignment to ng or even cg depending on how you act, and if your actions are to subtly different you can always talk to the dm about wanting your alingment to change.</p><p> </p><p> Some play styles the system isn't good for are people that want to play morally dubious characters and not have a label stuct on like evil even if they rightfully deserve it. This isn't always trying to get away with evil deeds, but it just might be a person who favors shades of gray and then the system might not be right for them.</p><p> </p><p> I have to say that planescape painted two pictures of alingment to me in the same world, one of black and white and the general alingment of the outsiders and planes. But it also painted shades of gray, with the factions who were very loosely based on alingment if at all. All the factions could have people of radicaly different alingments in them on at least one end of the faction. The aranachists I could see having cel members that wanted chaos to reign, and cg members who saw the factions as being to powerful and believed that power corrupts, and was just trying to get the power spread around more evenly. I could see le members of the guvener's (faction based on documenting the laws of planes) who wanted to find ways to exploit the laws of the planes for their own power and lg members who wanted to find better ways to help people, and ln members who were just in pursuit of knowladge.</p><p> </p><p> The alignment system does put a certain black and white in the game, but the dm has a lot of control over how much black and white. They can have characters of radicaly different alignments working together because they have some common ideal even if for different reasons. They can protray the enemy as mercyless blackguards who want to kill as many people as they can, or misguided people that want whats best for a certain group even at the expense of others. They can have all orcs be inredemably evil, or the majority just be neutrals struggling to survive in a harsh society.</p><p> </p><p> Sorry about the rambling so I'll just sum up my point. The alingment system is only what you make out of it, no more, no less.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Liolel, post: 1507653, member: 1766"] Alingment is a fine system as long as it's remembered that alingment is based on your characters actions not the other way around. This means that if your playing a lg fighter but in the end you don't want to play a lawful character, you just need to start playing your character differently, maybe come up with a small roleplaying reason for the change (your character in gaining experince has found out that his lifestyle does not suit him, and starts shifting towards a more free lifestyle.) As your actions change a dm should shift your alignment to ng or even cg depending on how you act, and if your actions are to subtly different you can always talk to the dm about wanting your alingment to change. Some play styles the system isn't good for are people that want to play morally dubious characters and not have a label stuct on like evil even if they rightfully deserve it. This isn't always trying to get away with evil deeds, but it just might be a person who favors shades of gray and then the system might not be right for them. I have to say that planescape painted two pictures of alingment to me in the same world, one of black and white and the general alingment of the outsiders and planes. But it also painted shades of gray, with the factions who were very loosely based on alingment if at all. All the factions could have people of radicaly different alingments in them on at least one end of the faction. The aranachists I could see having cel members that wanted chaos to reign, and cg members who saw the factions as being to powerful and believed that power corrupts, and was just trying to get the power spread around more evenly. I could see le members of the guvener's (faction based on documenting the laws of planes) who wanted to find ways to exploit the laws of the planes for their own power and lg members who wanted to find better ways to help people, and ln members who were just in pursuit of knowladge. The alignment system does put a certain black and white in the game, but the dm has a lot of control over how much black and white. They can have characters of radicaly different alignments working together because they have some common ideal even if for different reasons. They can protray the enemy as mercyless blackguards who want to kill as many people as they can, or misguided people that want whats best for a certain group even at the expense of others. They can have all orcs be inredemably evil, or the majority just be neutrals struggling to survive in a harsh society. Sorry about the rambling so I'll just sum up my point. The alingment system is only what you make out of it, no more, no less. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Alignment. Who needs it?
Top