Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Alignment
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rystil Arden" data-source="post: 2796197" data-attributes="member: 29014"><p>I really don't like the Wizards alignment test. It is, in fact, the least favourite alignment test I've ever seen, including fan-made ones. Why? Because it tracks Good, Neutral, and Evil as separate categories (same for Lawful, Neutral, and Evil) and then it asks some questions where you can only get Good vs Neutral, or Neutral vs Evil. </p><p></p><p>My main beef is the questions where you can only get Neutral vs the alignment you think your character is *not*. Here's why: Let's say your character is Good. You see the Neutral vs Evil question that has four choices. Since most of the choices are really evil, you pick the most good one and get +2 to Neutral (the other choices gave +1 Neutral, +1 Evil, +2 Evil). You'll almost surely do this every time. Now the Good vs Neutral question. Let's say you aren't a complete saint (or maybe your Chaotic or Lawful side prevent you from picking the +2 Good choice), so you don't pick the completely self-sacrificng highest Good choice that would be Exalted, you just pick the +1 Good choice. This usually happens, and you get pegged as Neutral by the test because they just pick the category with the highest score out of Good, Neutral, and Evil without looking at the other two. Happens a huge amount of the time (See EternalKnight). But let's say my "Good" character goes back and changes two or three of the Neutral vs Evil questions to be utterly Vile and as Evil as can be. It isn't enough to push you to Evil, so guess what? Now you're Neutral Good <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/paranoid.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":uhoh:" title="Paranoid :uhoh:" data-shortname=":uhoh:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rystil Arden, post: 2796197, member: 29014"] I really don't like the Wizards alignment test. It is, in fact, the least favourite alignment test I've ever seen, including fan-made ones. Why? Because it tracks Good, Neutral, and Evil as separate categories (same for Lawful, Neutral, and Evil) and then it asks some questions where you can only get Good vs Neutral, or Neutral vs Evil. My main beef is the questions where you can only get Neutral vs the alignment you think your character is *not*. Here's why: Let's say your character is Good. You see the Neutral vs Evil question that has four choices. Since most of the choices are really evil, you pick the most good one and get +2 to Neutral (the other choices gave +1 Neutral, +1 Evil, +2 Evil). You'll almost surely do this every time. Now the Good vs Neutral question. Let's say you aren't a complete saint (or maybe your Chaotic or Lawful side prevent you from picking the +2 Good choice), so you don't pick the completely self-sacrificng highest Good choice that would be Exalted, you just pick the +1 Good choice. This usually happens, and you get pegged as Neutral by the test because they just pick the category with the highest score out of Good, Neutral, and Evil without looking at the other two. Happens a huge amount of the time (See EternalKnight). But let's say my "Good" character goes back and changes two or three of the Neutral vs Evil questions to be utterly Vile and as Evil as can be. It isn't enough to push you to Evil, so guess what? Now you're Neutral Good :uhoh: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Alignment
Top