Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Alignments anyone?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Zelda Themelin" data-source="post: 5890523" data-attributes="member: 167"><p>I use them. But players can change when game progress without any problems. I kinda expect them to stick into it as part of their personality, that doesn't change unless there is reason. I usually ban paladins etc. anyhow. Mainly because one player in my group wants to play them as excuse being ass. </p><p></p><p>I use alignment based magic things, and detect-spells work etc. </p><p></p><p>Alignment makes it easier as Jon_Dahl stated before me to choose way to motive players to go for some adventure. I know if they want to play heroic fools or mercenery types or criminals or cultists etc. Alignment tells part of that, not everything, but if you put that and character class and chosen god (or not) into line, I usually get idea.</p><p></p><p>I don't ban evil or chaotic. I just want that players are mostly on same page. I could run pvp games but since that's not what they really want, I want to minimize their reasons to hate each others from bigger reasons like general world view/religion. That never ends well. Alignment is first clue to what is not going to work well as party. Same goes for "anti-classes" ake those opposing specific other classes (forsakers and the like). </p><p></p><p>Also if people write down CN I ask what are their defining personality qualities. I also tell them it's not same as insane, neither is neutral obsessed with balance. If they want those things they are part of those other personality qualities. I usually get things like out for myself, and my best pals at the moment, and greed, and in some cases some rebellion inticing idealogies. But that could be N or CG or NE or even CE. Alignment tells better how far character usually goes to get what he wants and how nasty it usually gets.</p><p></p><p>I always liked palladium alignment better. It actually gave some insight to that do/don't do this part. Not perfect but some much better defined than D&D ever. Too bad naming there was bit "unprincibled srubulous" .... or how was that spelt. That's reason to like D&D alignment better, unfortunaly.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Zelda Themelin, post: 5890523, member: 167"] I use them. But players can change when game progress without any problems. I kinda expect them to stick into it as part of their personality, that doesn't change unless there is reason. I usually ban paladins etc. anyhow. Mainly because one player in my group wants to play them as excuse being ass. I use alignment based magic things, and detect-spells work etc. Alignment makes it easier as Jon_Dahl stated before me to choose way to motive players to go for some adventure. I know if they want to play heroic fools or mercenery types or criminals or cultists etc. Alignment tells part of that, not everything, but if you put that and character class and chosen god (or not) into line, I usually get idea. I don't ban evil or chaotic. I just want that players are mostly on same page. I could run pvp games but since that's not what they really want, I want to minimize their reasons to hate each others from bigger reasons like general world view/religion. That never ends well. Alignment is first clue to what is not going to work well as party. Same goes for "anti-classes" ake those opposing specific other classes (forsakers and the like). Also if people write down CN I ask what are their defining personality qualities. I also tell them it's not same as insane, neither is neutral obsessed with balance. If they want those things they are part of those other personality qualities. I usually get things like out for myself, and my best pals at the moment, and greed, and in some cases some rebellion inticing idealogies. But that could be N or CG or NE or even CE. Alignment tells better how far character usually goes to get what he wants and how nasty it usually gets. I always liked palladium alignment better. It actually gave some insight to that do/don't do this part. Not perfect but some much better defined than D&D ever. Too bad naming there was bit "unprincibled srubulous" .... or how was that spelt. That's reason to like D&D alignment better, unfortunaly. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Alignments anyone?
Top