Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Crimson Longinus" data-source="post: 8695916" data-attributes="member: 7025508">One certainly could and should discuss the GMing style. The issue really is with the extreme interpretation some people have with the &quot;lie.&quot; I would never in million years consider &quot;Can GM make interesting stuff happen when the PCs happen to around&quot; to be part of the basic checklist for D&amp;D. I'm really not talking about Viking-hat-GM-style, merely about the division of labour. As a GM, I am open to discuss thing, take suggestions and listen criticism. But I also don't think that I need to explain every detail of my invisible decision making process. But if the end result is not for the players liking, then complaining about that is absolutely fair. But ultimately I want to have the freedom to attempt to achieve satisfactory results in manner that seems most natural to me. And as player I extent that same courtesy to any GM I'm playing with.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Crimson Longinus, post: 8695916, member: 7025508"] One certainly could and should discuss the GMing style. The issue really is with the extreme interpretation some people have with the "lie." I would never in million years consider "Can GM make interesting stuff happen when the PCs happen to around" to be part of the basic checklist for D&D. I'm really not talking about Viking-hat-GM-style, merely about the division of labour. As a GM, I am open to discuss thing, take suggestions and listen criticism. But I also don't think that I need to explain every detail of my invisible decision making process. But if the end result is not for the players liking, then complaining about that is absolutely fair. But ultimately I want to have the freedom to attempt to achieve satisfactory results in manner that seems most natural to me. And as player I extent that same courtesy to any GM I'm playing with. [/QUOTE]

Verification