Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
ShortQuests -- Pocket Sized Adventures! An all-new collection of digest-sized D&D adventures designed for 1-2 game sessions.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
All About Grappling (Part Two)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Gansk" data-source="post: 2090076" data-attributes="member: 16383"><p>There are two contradicting statements -</p><p></p><p>PHB page 156: "If your base attack bonus allows you multiple attacks..."</p><p></p><p>MM page 312: "Creatures do not receive additional attacks from a high base attack bonus when using natural weapons."</p><p></p><p>I would love to ignore the MM statement, but that would allow a CR 6 Salamander to do over 12d6 damage in one round with two successful grapple checks. I am hesitant to give monsters that kind of damage potential over some ambiguous rule. That's why I don't allow the hydra to attack with all of its heads each time it gets an AoO.</p><p></p><p>So here is my revised interpretation of the rules:</p><p></p><p>The ape can use the "Attack Your Opponent" option with either the claw or bite. The claw attacks at +3, the bite at -2. If the attack hits, it does lethal damage according to the natural weapon used.</p><p></p><p>The ape can use the "Damage Your Opponent" option to make a grapple check at +12. If successful, the attack does 1d4 damage (unarmed strike damage for a large creature). However, the damage is lethal unless the ape took the grapple check at +8 instead. Also there is a strength bonus to damage that is dependent on which natural attack established the grapple in the first place. If it was the claw, then +5 damage, if it was the bite, then only +2 damage to the 1d4. The type of damage is not necessarily bludgeoning, which it would be if the ape were a human. Instead the type of damage corresponds to the natural attack that established the grapple (piercing and slashing for the claw, all types for the bite.)</p><p></p><p>The polar bear is now essentially the same as the ape in the number of attacks or grapple checks it can make (one per round). The Improved Grab ability allows the polar bear to do 1d8+8 claw damage with a successful grapple check instead of 1d4+8. The Improved Grab ability also gives the bear other options that the ape does not get (these options are in the Improved Grab description).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Gansk, post: 2090076, member: 16383"] There are two contradicting statements - PHB page 156: "If your base attack bonus allows you multiple attacks..." MM page 312: "Creatures do not receive additional attacks from a high base attack bonus when using natural weapons." I would love to ignore the MM statement, but that would allow a CR 6 Salamander to do over 12d6 damage in one round with two successful grapple checks. I am hesitant to give monsters that kind of damage potential over some ambiguous rule. That's why I don't allow the hydra to attack with all of its heads each time it gets an AoO. So here is my revised interpretation of the rules: The ape can use the "Attack Your Opponent" option with either the claw or bite. The claw attacks at +3, the bite at -2. If the attack hits, it does lethal damage according to the natural weapon used. The ape can use the "Damage Your Opponent" option to make a grapple check at +12. If successful, the attack does 1d4 damage (unarmed strike damage for a large creature). However, the damage is lethal unless the ape took the grapple check at +8 instead. Also there is a strength bonus to damage that is dependent on which natural attack established the grapple in the first place. If it was the claw, then +5 damage, if it was the bite, then only +2 damage to the 1d4. The type of damage is not necessarily bludgeoning, which it would be if the ape were a human. Instead the type of damage corresponds to the natural attack that established the grapple (piercing and slashing for the claw, all types for the bite.) The polar bear is now essentially the same as the ape in the number of attacks or grapple checks it can make (one per round). The Improved Grab ability allows the polar bear to do 1d8+8 claw damage with a successful grapple check instead of 1d4+8. The Improved Grab ability also gives the bear other options that the ape does not get (these options are in the Improved Grab description). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
All About Grappling (Part Two)
Top