Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Blue" data-source="post: 9211528" data-attributes="member: 20564">I'm going to assume that the + is not to knock the idea and discuss how we can actually implement this.We'd have to remove all utility spells in order to keep skills (and non-casters) valid and balanced character options during other pillars of play.&nbsp; Or remove casters from having skills, so casters have their at-will solutions and non-casters have their at-will solutions.With all spells at-will, and clever players finding loopholes around other restrictions, we would need to carefully balance so that spells can never do more than martials, likely by buffing martials since we can only discuss this positively in a + thread.&nbsp; Right now casters can do more, but only some of the time.&nbsp; Making one side of the equation the same as martials forces the other side of the equation to be the same as martials.We end up with wonderful character balance - all characters can do the same regardless of casting or not.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Blue, post: 9211528, member: 20564"] I'm going to assume that the + is not to knock the idea and discuss how we can actually implement this. We'd have to remove all utility spells in order to keep skills (and non-casters) valid and balanced character options during other pillars of play. Or remove casters from having skills, so casters have their at-will solutions and non-casters have their at-will solutions. With all spells at-will, and clever players finding loopholes around other restrictions, we would need to carefully balance so that spells can never do more than martials, likely by buffing martials since we can only discuss this positively in a + thread. Right now casters can do more, but only some of the time. Making one side of the equation the same as martials forces the other side of the equation to be the same as martials. We end up with wonderful character balance - all characters can do the same regardless of casting or not. [/QUOTE]

Verification