Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="prabe" data-source="post: 8284613" data-attributes="member: 7016699">While I can't disagree, I don't think I like the idea that scenario writers would intentionally leave something that could either A) encourage (arguably) bad GMing or B) cause problems for a GM.I think it'd be nice if 5E had more or better DMing advice in the DMG. I mean, the attitude of "And it harm none, do what thou wilt" is ... nice, but some specific advice on how to avoid some specific pitfalls that lead to some specific harms would be nicer.Yeah. Knowing the table is definitely an advantage. The fact the two D&D games I'm running have been going a while makes me more comfortable that way.Can the DM in B/X ignore Morale, or specify that some instance of ... I dunno ... orcs ... has a different Morale number? It seems plausible they could, but I never really played much B/X and I honestly don't know.Even if 5E had Morale, the DM would be have the authority to alter or ignore it in any given instance (if the rest of the game were unchanged, I mean).</blockquote>