Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Allowing Vicious Mockery via telepathy
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DEFCON 1" data-source="post: 7477686" data-attributes="member: 7006"><p>For me it comes down to the character, not the mechanics.</p><p></p><p>Does it make sense for this particular character in this particular game to be able to Viciously Mock someone via telepathy? Is the telepathy an important aspect of the character? Does the player play the PC such that the telepathy is used intrusively, obnoxiously against other people? If that is the case, then yeah, I'd probably allow the PC to gain the mechanical benefits that come with that spell. Because it makes sense for this specific character to have developed this ability.</p><p></p><p>For other PCs? Ones for whom telepathy is barely used, inconsequential, or its use is treated very politely? Most likely, the player themself probably wouldn't even ask to try.</p><p></p><p>I am very much a story-first DM, and that any game mechanics are only used to enhance the story. I don't care at all about "consistency" of the game rules between PCs, between NPCs, or between sessions or most especially campaigns. So I'd never have any necessity or reason to worry about coming up with "one rule" for this situation that applies across the board forevermore. To me that's pointless. A Nature Cleric can gain a few extra specialized uses out of their nature spells that the war cleric cannot... even if both PCs are in the same game. Just like a telepathy-strong GOO warlock might use its telepathy differently than just a Evocation wizard who happens to have the Detect Thoughts spell as one of their myriad of abilities. And in each case, I'll see what has happened within the game, whether what the player tries or wants to do is effective and/or cool, and makes sense for the way the character has been played. If it does, then sure, I'll allow it no problem. Especially because I keep my eyes open for every PC and what they might accomplish later on, so its not like equality won't eventually find its way in the game.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DEFCON 1, post: 7477686, member: 7006"] For me it comes down to the character, not the mechanics. Does it make sense for this particular character in this particular game to be able to Viciously Mock someone via telepathy? Is the telepathy an important aspect of the character? Does the player play the PC such that the telepathy is used intrusively, obnoxiously against other people? If that is the case, then yeah, I'd probably allow the PC to gain the mechanical benefits that come with that spell. Because it makes sense for this specific character to have developed this ability. For other PCs? Ones for whom telepathy is barely used, inconsequential, or its use is treated very politely? Most likely, the player themself probably wouldn't even ask to try. I am very much a story-first DM, and that any game mechanics are only used to enhance the story. I don't care at all about "consistency" of the game rules between PCs, between NPCs, or between sessions or most especially campaigns. So I'd never have any necessity or reason to worry about coming up with "one rule" for this situation that applies across the board forevermore. To me that's pointless. A Nature Cleric can gain a few extra specialized uses out of their nature spells that the war cleric cannot... even if both PCs are in the same game. Just like a telepathy-strong GOO warlock might use its telepathy differently than just a Evocation wizard who happens to have the Detect Thoughts spell as one of their myriad of abilities. And in each case, I'll see what has happened within the game, whether what the player tries or wants to do is effective and/or cool, and makes sense for the way the character has been played. If it does, then sure, I'll allow it no problem. Especially because I keep my eyes open for every PC and what they might accomplish later on, so its not like equality won't eventually find its way in the game. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Allowing Vicious Mockery via telepathy
Top