Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Alt Sorceror Plans
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Urbannen" data-source="post: 412317" data-attributes="member: 7643"><p>I think the main problem is that the sorcerer is poorly defined class, which has been mentioned before. The sorcerer's class description says that they begin to spontaneously cast 0-level spells at puberty and then later learn to develop their "powers." However, the PHB also says that it is impossible to distinguish between a wizard and a sorcerer when they cast spells. These two things are incompatible. When a wizard casts spells, he uses specific words, gestures, and material components. He learns these things through study. The PHB implies that the knowledge of these words, gestures, and material components comes to the sorcerer by intuition. IMO, that's crazy. If a spell's verbal component is "Sambo Bizzle Foobar Hiakim", and you need to sprinkle crushed pearl over your toes, every sorcerer is not going to come up with that by intution. Yet, all sorcerers cast spells just like wizards. There has to be a decision: either sorcerers develop spell-like abilities, or they learn how to cast spells like wizards, except that they internalize the knowledge of the spell. </p><p></p><p>If sorcerers develop spell-like abilities, which is consistent with how they are described in flavor text, then something like Monte Cook's variant sorcerer would be very appropriate. If sorcerers develop spell-like abilities, then they should only need somatic components to cast spells - think Princess Ariel from the "Thundarr the Barbarian" cartoon. She was a "Sorceress" and could not use her magic when her hands were bound. Where would they learn the verbal components, anyway? Additionally, Sorcerers would not be able to use or make scrolls. You can't pull the words of a foreign language, in this case, magic, out of thin air. Their class skills would have to be revamped to reflect the fact that they do not have magical "training." </p><p></p><p>If a sorcerer learns to cast spells indistinguishably from a wizard, then they should actually have to learn their spells from someone or through study. The difference is that their special talents allow them to internalize the spells. They would thus be able to scribe and use scrolls. They would not spontaneously gain knowledge of a the new spells of their choice whenever they gained a level. From the standpoint of current rules mechanics, this philosophy is the most consistent.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Urbannen, post: 412317, member: 7643"] I think the main problem is that the sorcerer is poorly defined class, which has been mentioned before. The sorcerer's class description says that they begin to spontaneously cast 0-level spells at puberty and then later learn to develop their "powers." However, the PHB also says that it is impossible to distinguish between a wizard and a sorcerer when they cast spells. These two things are incompatible. When a wizard casts spells, he uses specific words, gestures, and material components. He learns these things through study. The PHB implies that the knowledge of these words, gestures, and material components comes to the sorcerer by intuition. IMO, that's crazy. If a spell's verbal component is "Sambo Bizzle Foobar Hiakim", and you need to sprinkle crushed pearl over your toes, every sorcerer is not going to come up with that by intution. Yet, all sorcerers cast spells just like wizards. There has to be a decision: either sorcerers develop spell-like abilities, or they learn how to cast spells like wizards, except that they internalize the knowledge of the spell. If sorcerers develop spell-like abilities, which is consistent with how they are described in flavor text, then something like Monte Cook's variant sorcerer would be very appropriate. If sorcerers develop spell-like abilities, then they should only need somatic components to cast spells - think Princess Ariel from the "Thundarr the Barbarian" cartoon. She was a "Sorceress" and could not use her magic when her hands were bound. Where would they learn the verbal components, anyway? Additionally, Sorcerers would not be able to use or make scrolls. You can't pull the words of a foreign language, in this case, magic, out of thin air. Their class skills would have to be revamped to reflect the fact that they do not have magical "training." If a sorcerer learns to cast spells indistinguishably from a wizard, then they should actually have to learn their spells from someone or through study. The difference is that their special talents allow them to internalize the spells. They would thus be able to scribe and use scrolls. They would not spontaneously gain knowledge of a the new spells of their choice whenever they gained a level. From the standpoint of current rules mechanics, this philosophy is the most consistent. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Alt Sorceror Plans
Top