Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Alternate Barbarian/Berserker Rages: Need Help!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Spatzimaus" data-source="post: 3113050" data-attributes="member: 3051"><p>That's fine, it's pretty much how we made the system in the first place, evolving every time someone came up with a new bonus they wanted to add. Originally, the Major Drawbacks only had the first three, but the later two were added by player request when they couldn't find one that fit their concepts. For instance, some of the suggested ones we had and then removed were:</p><p>> "May enter Trance involuntarily"... that is, if the DM decides you're in danger of getting too angry/scared/stressed/whatever, you have to make a Will save, and failure forces you to enter the Trance against your will (and you do get charged for its use). This one wasn't bad, and there were plenty of literary examples to draw from, but there was too much argument over the trigger, and "DM's discretion" is just too much work to deal with for 20 levels.</p><p>> "Take 50% more damage from all sources", which is actually really nasty. In fact, it was so crippling in the long run that we split it into the two others (can't defend, can't save) instead, since at least those depend on what sort of enemy you face.</p><p>As long as it's a pretty severe penalty, add whichever ones you want; as a general theme the ones we kept were all along the lines of "can't do X while in Trance", but that's not required.</p><p></p><p>Also, we originally didn't have a Table C, and Table B was much shorter; what you see in those tables are pretty much all of the abilities we used for PCs and NPCs in that campaign. (That "re-roll any one die" ability kept one cohort NPC alive practically forever.)</p><p></p><p><strong>Sound of Azure</strong>: Glad you like it. It does sound like it'd fit pretty well with your setting, although if you're using an island culture you could add abilities like "breathe underwater" or "Swim speed equal to your land speed" to the tables. I was trying to stay as nonmagical as I could (and breathing underwater kinda defeats that, although I suppose you could change it to "hold breath for the duration of trance"), but if you're tying it to your Old Religion, that limitation no longer applies.</p><p></p><p>I'll warn that this system is, of course, MUCH more complex than the core class it replaces. Of course, I've never liked how the melee classes in the PHB could be summed up in a few paragraphs and a chart or two, while the caster classes required fifty pages of spell descriptions. One of my intentions was to raise the Berserker to the complexity of the other classes. So, while I of course like the system I posted, feel free to trim it down if you don't want players to feel overwhelmed.</p><p></p><p>Oh, and while we never got around to fleshing it out (no need), it'd be easy to come up with Trance-centric PrCs, or Feats that add extra Trance abilities.</p><p></p><p>EDIT: forgot to add, the "cannot save" Major Drawback would be really crippling in the rules-as-written, but IMC we removed all the save-or-die stuff. It's still bad to get <em>charmed</em>, of course, but at least that can be dealt with in other ways; being killed by every guy with a <em>slay living</em> would suck. So unless you're changing the spells like we did, you should probably remove that one for now, or at least rework it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Spatzimaus, post: 3113050, member: 3051"] That's fine, it's pretty much how we made the system in the first place, evolving every time someone came up with a new bonus they wanted to add. Originally, the Major Drawbacks only had the first three, but the later two were added by player request when they couldn't find one that fit their concepts. For instance, some of the suggested ones we had and then removed were: > "May enter Trance involuntarily"... that is, if the DM decides you're in danger of getting too angry/scared/stressed/whatever, you have to make a Will save, and failure forces you to enter the Trance against your will (and you do get charged for its use). This one wasn't bad, and there were plenty of literary examples to draw from, but there was too much argument over the trigger, and "DM's discretion" is just too much work to deal with for 20 levels. > "Take 50% more damage from all sources", which is actually really nasty. In fact, it was so crippling in the long run that we split it into the two others (can't defend, can't save) instead, since at least those depend on what sort of enemy you face. As long as it's a pretty severe penalty, add whichever ones you want; as a general theme the ones we kept were all along the lines of "can't do X while in Trance", but that's not required. Also, we originally didn't have a Table C, and Table B was much shorter; what you see in those tables are pretty much all of the abilities we used for PCs and NPCs in that campaign. (That "re-roll any one die" ability kept one cohort NPC alive practically forever.) [b]Sound of Azure[/b]: Glad you like it. It does sound like it'd fit pretty well with your setting, although if you're using an island culture you could add abilities like "breathe underwater" or "Swim speed equal to your land speed" to the tables. I was trying to stay as nonmagical as I could (and breathing underwater kinda defeats that, although I suppose you could change it to "hold breath for the duration of trance"), but if you're tying it to your Old Religion, that limitation no longer applies. I'll warn that this system is, of course, MUCH more complex than the core class it replaces. Of course, I've never liked how the melee classes in the PHB could be summed up in a few paragraphs and a chart or two, while the caster classes required fifty pages of spell descriptions. One of my intentions was to raise the Berserker to the complexity of the other classes. So, while I of course like the system I posted, feel free to trim it down if you don't want players to feel overwhelmed. Oh, and while we never got around to fleshing it out (no need), it'd be easy to come up with Trance-centric PrCs, or Feats that add extra Trance abilities. EDIT: forgot to add, the "cannot save" Major Drawback would be really crippling in the rules-as-written, but IMC we removed all the save-or-die stuff. It's still bad to get [i]charmed[/i], of course, but at least that can be dealt with in other ways; being killed by every guy with a [i]slay living[/i] would suck. So unless you're changing the spells like we did, you should probably remove that one for now, or at least rework it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Alternate Barbarian/Berserker Rages: Need Help!
Top