Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Alternate Freddy vs. Jason ending [Spoilers]
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Alzrius" data-source="post: 1328942" data-attributes="member: 8461"><p>Actually, as long as we're discussing what might/could/should have been, I think that there should have been part of the movie where Freddy manages to rip out Jason's heart (probably near that last fight, right after where he gouges out his eyes), but then is mesmerized by it, a la <em>Jason Goes to Hell</em> and eats it...that would either kill one or the other of them permanently...or fuse them into one! </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>According to the novel, Freddy had forgotten what he had said before.</p><p></p><p>The novel also intimates, though it never says outright, that had Freddy been able to drown Jason in Jason's memory/nightmare where he was a little boy dying again, then that would have permanently killed Jason in the real world. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Maybe because unkillable dead guys are rare enough that they'd each think they're the only one? Or perhaps because Freddy and Jason's particular brands of immortality are so very different.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>From the director's standpoint, I can understand why it seemed like Jason spent most of the fights with Freddy getting his butt kicked. In the fight in the dream world, Freddy just has more experience, and imagination, both of which would be crucial in an environment where anything you can visualize can be. Only Jason's utterly indomitable will helped him there.</p><p></p><p>Likewise, in the fight in the real world, its less about rationale and more about simply how to keep the fight going. Jason can soak up damage like a sponge does water, so there's no problem with Freddy scoring hit after hit on him. On the other hand, Freddy, in the real world, has no particular resistance to being hurt (that we know of). Given Jason's titanic strength, one or two blows would be all that would be needed then to dismember Freddy utterly. Hence, the fights would have to have Jason missing more often then not.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I agree that it was a good move that they kept Jason as a clear-cut bad guy. There was no way Jason could have been Freddy's first victim though, either when he was alive or dead, since Freddy always killed his victims, and we already knew how Jason died. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Agreed.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Boy would that be something, especially since he lived (and died) in 1300 AD.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I can't bring myself to be too upset over this, since I'm not much of a fan of either film series.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Alzrius, post: 1328942, member: 8461"] Actually, as long as we're discussing what might/could/should have been, I think that there should have been part of the movie where Freddy manages to rip out Jason's heart (probably near that last fight, right after where he gouges out his eyes), but then is mesmerized by it, a la [I]Jason Goes to Hell[/I] and eats it...that would either kill one or the other of them permanently...or fuse them into one! According to the novel, Freddy had forgotten what he had said before. The novel also intimates, though it never says outright, that had Freddy been able to drown Jason in Jason's memory/nightmare where he was a little boy dying again, then that would have permanently killed Jason in the real world. Maybe because unkillable dead guys are rare enough that they'd each think they're the only one? Or perhaps because Freddy and Jason's particular brands of immortality are so very different. From the director's standpoint, I can understand why it seemed like Jason spent most of the fights with Freddy getting his butt kicked. In the fight in the dream world, Freddy just has more experience, and imagination, both of which would be crucial in an environment where anything you can visualize can be. Only Jason's utterly indomitable will helped him there. Likewise, in the fight in the real world, its less about rationale and more about simply how to keep the fight going. Jason can soak up damage like a sponge does water, so there's no problem with Freddy scoring hit after hit on him. On the other hand, Freddy, in the real world, has no particular resistance to being hurt (that we know of). Given Jason's titanic strength, one or two blows would be all that would be needed then to dismember Freddy utterly. Hence, the fights would have to have Jason missing more often then not. I agree that it was a good move that they kept Jason as a clear-cut bad guy. There was no way Jason could have been Freddy's first victim though, either when he was alive or dead, since Freddy always killed his victims, and we already knew how Jason died. Agreed. Boy would that be something, especially since he lived (and died) in 1300 AD. I can't bring myself to be too upset over this, since I'm not much of a fan of either film series. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Alternate Freddy vs. Jason ending [Spoilers]
Top