Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Alternate rules for "Surprise Round"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Laurefindel" data-source="post: 8401158" data-attributes="member: 67296"><p><em>TL;DR: use Stealth/Perception for initiative.</em></p><p></p><p>I know, 5e has no surprise round per se. This variant doesn't either. This variant aims to provide an easy plug-and-play replacement for the RaW surprise rules. My dissatisfaction with 5e surprise rules are threefold:</p><p></p><p><strong>It's a long(ish) process. </strong>Ok, It's not <em>that </em>long, but its an extra step where you have to roll for the attacker's Stealth check and compare each NPC with the passive perception of each PC (or vice versa). Once this is done, you roll initiative for everyone and apply the proper condition to the "ambushees".</p><p></p><p><strong>It can lead to weird situations. </strong>This is mostly an artifact of 5e stealth rules and the turn-base nature of the system, but you can run into situations where PCs are aware of danger and not able to act on it because they do not see any threat (but have initiative). I guess PCs are entitled to some kind of "spider-sense", but I'd rather have that as a feat or a class ability.</p><p></p><p><strong>Ambushes are hard to set-up.</strong> In order to surprise a creature, the Stealth checks of <em>every </em>attacker must beat that creature's passive Perception's DC. If the party wants to ambush monsters, all PCs must roll well otherwise all enemies are tipped off. Similarly, a surprise gang-up by a handful of goblins or bugbears is almost certain to fail against the PCs. There is some verisimilitude in the fact that high numbers are harder to hide, but there is a difference between a small band of brigands and a whole army of them. Group checks fix this to a certain degree.</p><p></p><p>So here's the variant houserule (concise version)</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><em><span style="font-size: 18px">What this variant does:</span></em></p><p></p><p><strong>It Makes it Easier and Faster.</strong> Every creature has one roll to make, no need to compare active checks with passive scores, and no need to track who can act on their first turn and who cannot.</p><p></p><p><strong>It's Backward Compatible. </strong>It respects the "against any creature that hasn't taken a turn in the combat yet" and "during the first round of combat" formulations in 5e for things related to surprise.</p><p></p><p><strong>Stealthy Characters act First.</strong> If you are proficient in the Stealth skill, you have better chances of acting before your opponents, regarldess of your initiative score.</p><p></p><p><strong>Perceptive Characters can React Quickly. </strong>If you are proficient in the Perception skill, you have better chances of acting before your attacker, regarldess of your initiative score. <em>I'd suggest granting advantage on perception/investigation checks for characters with the Alert feat.</em></p><p></p><p><strong>It's Easy to Adjudicate on the Fly.</strong> It's easy for the DM to give advantage or disadvantage to the attackers or defenders based on various exploration factors, as they deem appropriate.</p><p></p><p><em><span style="font-size: 18px">What this variant does not fix:</span></em></p><p></p><p><strong>Ambushers can still be beaten at their own game.</strong> It is theoretically possible for all defenders to get their turns before their ambushed attackers. That's one of my initial dissatisfaction that this variant does not fix, but it has more to do with the nature of the turn-based system that D&D uses.</p><p></p><p>I've never played with this houserule that - I must say - cannot be credited to me (altought I can't remember from whom or where i heard it first). Nevertheless, I'm interested to know what you think of it, and of what I didn't think of.</p><p></p><p>'findel</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Laurefindel, post: 8401158, member: 67296"] [I]TL;DR: use Stealth/Perception for initiative.[/I] I know, 5e has no surprise round per se. This variant doesn't either. This variant aims to provide an easy plug-and-play replacement for the RaW surprise rules. My dissatisfaction with 5e surprise rules are threefold: [B]It's a long(ish) process. [/B]Ok, It's not [I]that [/I]long, but its an extra step where you have to roll for the attacker's Stealth check and compare each NPC with the passive perception of each PC (or vice versa). Once this is done, you roll initiative for everyone and apply the proper condition to the "ambushees". [B]It can lead to weird situations. [/B]This is mostly an artifact of 5e stealth rules and the turn-base nature of the system, but you can run into situations where PCs are aware of danger and not able to act on it because they do not see any threat (but have initiative). I guess PCs are entitled to some kind of "spider-sense", but I'd rather have that as a feat or a class ability. [B]Ambushes are hard to set-up.[/B] In order to surprise a creature, the Stealth checks of [I]every [/I]attacker must beat that creature's passive Perception's DC. If the party wants to ambush monsters, all PCs must roll well otherwise all enemies are tipped off. Similarly, a surprise gang-up by a handful of goblins or bugbears is almost certain to fail against the PCs. There is some verisimilitude in the fact that high numbers are harder to hide, but there is a difference between a small band of brigands and a whole army of them. Group checks fix this to a certain degree. So here's the variant houserule (concise version) [I][SIZE=5]What this variant does:[/SIZE][/I] [B]It Makes it Easier and Faster.[/B] Every creature has one roll to make, no need to compare active checks with passive scores, and no need to track who can act on their first turn and who cannot. [B]It's Backward Compatible. [/B]It respects the "against any creature that hasn't taken a turn in the combat yet" and "during the first round of combat" formulations in 5e for things related to surprise. [B]Stealthy Characters act First.[/B] If you are proficient in the Stealth skill, you have better chances of acting before your opponents, regarldess of your initiative score. [B]Perceptive Characters can React Quickly. [/B]If you are proficient in the Perception skill, you have better chances of acting before your attacker, regarldess of your initiative score. [I]I'd suggest granting advantage on perception/investigation checks for characters with the Alert feat.[/I] [B]It's Easy to Adjudicate on the Fly.[/B] It's easy for the DM to give advantage or disadvantage to the attackers or defenders based on various exploration factors, as they deem appropriate. [I][SIZE=5]What this variant does not fix:[/SIZE][/I] [B]Ambushers can still be beaten at their own game.[/B] It is theoretically possible for all defenders to get their turns before their ambushed attackers. That's one of my initial dissatisfaction that this variant does not fix, but it has more to do with the nature of the turn-based system that D&D uses. I've never played with this houserule that - I must say - cannot be credited to me (altought I can't remember from whom or where i heard it first). Nevertheless, I'm interested to know what you think of it, and of what I didn't think of. 'findel [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Alternate rules for "Surprise Round"
Top