Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Umbran" data-source="post: 9390697" data-attributes="member: 177">If you are saying it again, you've perhaps missed the point.Yes, OMG, if the GM isn't happy the game will end!&nbsp; If the players aren't happy, the game will also end.The obvious result is that BOTH SIDES need to be a bit flexible.&nbsp; And maybe need to find new groups if they find they can't compromise.This is not rocket surgery, or some surprising new insight.How much?&nbsp; 17.&nbsp; Exactly 17 Wheedles.&nbsp; The &quot;Wheedle&quot; is the International Diplomacy Standard Unit of compromise, named after George C. Wheedle, top negotiatior for the now defunct League of Nations.Which is my way of saying, geeze, maybe frame the question in a way that has an actual answer?I think there is a better question that will get a more useful answer:&nbsp; Why is the GM running a game at all?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Umbran, post: 9390697, member: 177"] If you are saying it again, you've perhaps missed the point. Yes, OMG, if the GM isn't happy the game will end! If the players aren't happy, the game will also end. The obvious result is that [I]BOTH SIDES[/I] need to be a bit flexible. And maybe need to find new groups if they find they can't compromise. This is not rocket surgery, or some surprising new insight. How much? 17. Exactly 17 Wheedles. The "Wheedle" is the International Diplomacy Standard Unit of compromise, named after George C. Wheedle, top negotiatior for the now defunct League of Nations. Which is my way of saying, geeze, maybe frame the question in a way that has an actual answer? I think there is a better question that will get a more useful answer: Why is the GM running a game at all? [/QUOTE]

Verification