Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Alternate thought - rule of cool is bad for gaming
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Umbran" data-source="post: 9393572" data-attributes="member: 177"><p>(I had to walk away from my keyboard for several hours, so maybe others have covered this)</p><p></p><p>I see a couple of issues here:</p><p></p><p>You are assuming far too much in asserting the "doesn't apply" bits. You, the person who declares the action, don't get to just flatly assert what does and does not apply. </p><p></p><p>You're making a shield, using metal and coal in a world of scarcity. Using them may mean that something else can't be made - maybe the harvest will be bad because those resources aren't used on fixing farm equipment. An important person in the community may feel it is wasteful and is willing to come into personal conflict over it bringing social consequences to bear. Or, maybe someone is going to be willing to beat you up and take your shield.</p><p></p><p>All those things <em>can</em> apply. And, by the sound of it, in AW, if you want the mechanical benefit of a Move, some of that <em>has to</em> apply. Otherwise, we just narrate that you make a shield, but you gain none of the possible mechanical benefits of any Moves. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yeah, but having "simply succeed" be a possible result is not actually a requirement! The mechanics must allow you to reach your goal, but they don't have to allow you to do so without consequences or complications.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Umbran, post: 9393572, member: 177"] (I had to walk away from my keyboard for several hours, so maybe others have covered this) I see a couple of issues here: You are assuming far too much in asserting the "doesn't apply" bits. You, the person who declares the action, don't get to just flatly assert what does and does not apply. You're making a shield, using metal and coal in a world of scarcity. Using them may mean that something else can't be made - maybe the harvest will be bad because those resources aren't used on fixing farm equipment. An important person in the community may feel it is wasteful and is willing to come into personal conflict over it bringing social consequences to bear. Or, maybe someone is going to be willing to beat you up and take your shield. All those things [I]can[/I] apply. And, by the sound of it, in AW, if you want the mechanical benefit of a Move, some of that [I]has to[/I] apply. Otherwise, we just narrate that you make a shield, but you gain none of the possible mechanical benefits of any Moves. Yeah, but having "simply succeed" be a possible result is not actually a requirement! The mechanics must allow you to reach your goal, but they don't have to allow you to do so without consequences or complications. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Alternate thought - rule of cool is bad for gaming
Top