Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Lanefan" data-source="post: 9393582" data-attributes="member: 29398">Sorry, but I think you've misread me again.And so I'll be clear: I'm not talking about individual action declaration and-or resolution.I'm talking about playstyle and focus, suggesting that a game that truly does have a rule for everything would by default be agnostic to both playstyle and focus as it could - by having a rule for everything - handle any playstyle and-or any focus with equal ease.And we're then told the game in question was designed with intention of seeking/promoting a somewhat specific playstyle and focus, which doesn't square.======Unrelated to your quote above:I should point out that a game that truly has a rule for everything doesn't have to have a bajillion micro-granular rules in order to accomplish this end.  The extreme example:  "Anything goes, there are no rules" is a single macro-rule that in fact does cover everything.</blockquote>