Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="NexusX" data-source="post: 2716586" data-attributes="member: 27658">Very well, Nyaricus, sounds good. I mentioned the legalities (word?) as I thought you might want to actually have something printable that included the full descriptions. Just making a list should be fine with all involved and certainly easier than what I had in mind. As not all of the players in my Stargate: Cosmothea campaign have access to the different books in which these feats are derived, I was planning on putting together a feat book for them, eventually ... but wait a minute ... I don't have all the books either! So, I wouldn't be able to do much on the books I don't have other than make suggestions based on summary grouping.Now then, Nyaricus, the naming schema and ranks sounds fine (we might want to play with a feat name if it's too obscure, but that is for later, and might not come up anyway). As for posting the list of feats on EN, as I said in my earlier post, the list is just plain way too long (56+ pages - I love feats, but nobody really needs 56+ pages! I'm thinking with this system, it will also shed light on some feats people might not have been aware of before, due to the shear numbers). I think it would be better to just list Scaling Feat Chains we have developed, their associated feats, and previous names (maybe also the book we got them out of). We should also post which chain we are working on to minimize duplication.Once a chain is posted, it can be reviewed and we'll modify it as needed then slap some kind of official doohickey on it or put it into a new thread of official Scaling Font Chains or?? Thoughts anyone else? This shouldn't be as difficult as I thought - at least not the list process (certainly less work than my original idea for my players). I'm in. Nexus X</blockquote>

Verification