Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Alternative: Girls (females) in D&D/ Roleplaying
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Krensky" data-source="post: 5280136" data-attributes="member: 30936"><p>As has been pointed out, sometimes ambiguity is a good thing, because what you're dealing with is ambiguous. All pronouns can increase ambiguity. Abandoning thou for the singular you can increase ambiguity. It certainly led to the hilarious use of thou as a respectful and formal form of address.</p><p></p><p>I gave you an example. It helps because it doesn't annoy people like pawsplay who feel the generic masculine is offensive or off putting. It doesn't offend... well I don't think anyone's admitted to being annoyed at using she as a generic pronoun in this thread but it won't annoy them. It doesn't annoy people like me by using clumsy constructions, avoiding pronouns, or (worst of all) alternating between he and she as the generic pronoun (seriously people, pick one, run with it, and take your lumps).</p><p></p><p>It only seems to ignore a tiny group of people, like yourself, who insist it's wrong on purely proscriptive grounds despite common usage since the fourteenth century. Again, in a living language common use is the primary determiner of correctness or (since you moved the goal posts) goodness.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>As an extreme case, a trans-gender person who does not identify as either male or female, or (even more extreme) identifies as non-gendered. </p><p></p><p>Anther would be a corporate person.</p><p></p><p>As a less extreme case when talking about a generic individual of indeterminate sex or in some cases gender, although I'm not sure if gendered pronouns in things like medical advice and products relating to sex specific items annoy trans-gendered people or not. </p><p></p><p>"When the candidate is finished with the written exam, they should be directed to the physical examination room." You don't know the gender (presumably) of the candidate and because, logically, the sentence means "For all candidates, the candidate was directed to the physical examination room upon finishing the candidate's written exam.".</p><p></p><p>Now one for you. 'Fix' this:</p><p></p><p></p><p>Mary saw everyone before John noticed them.</p><p></p><p></p><p>As for the other thing, that's pawsplay's beef not mine. Unlike pawsplay (making what I feel is a safe assumption here) I am not really a fan of gender-neutral English since in my personal experience it's often either a tool and justification to belittle others (Hello Professor Smithwicke! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> ) or (more typically) is stirring up annoyance over small things instead of addressing large issues. That said, if you are attempting to be unbiased in language you have two choices when you need a gender neutral pronoun. They or one stolen from another language. While English has a reputation for muggling other languages for vocabulary, it never really seems to take when it's intentionally done for this sort of thing. Mu hasn't caught on, for instance. </p><p></p><p>However, I think you read pawsplay wrong. The interrogative responses showed bias. It would, barring knowledge not presented in the example, have been more correct and unbiased to use the epicene they in them because the interrogator (or interrogatrix) doesn't know the gender of the subject.</p><p></p><p>As an aside, I think we need more gender specific titles. Words ending in -rix are fun. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Krensky, post: 5280136, member: 30936"] As has been pointed out, sometimes ambiguity is a good thing, because what you're dealing with is ambiguous. All pronouns can increase ambiguity. Abandoning thou for the singular you can increase ambiguity. It certainly led to the hilarious use of thou as a respectful and formal form of address. I gave you an example. It helps because it doesn't annoy people like pawsplay who feel the generic masculine is offensive or off putting. It doesn't offend... well I don't think anyone's admitted to being annoyed at using she as a generic pronoun in this thread but it won't annoy them. It doesn't annoy people like me by using clumsy constructions, avoiding pronouns, or (worst of all) alternating between he and she as the generic pronoun (seriously people, pick one, run with it, and take your lumps). It only seems to ignore a tiny group of people, like yourself, who insist it's wrong on purely proscriptive grounds despite common usage since the fourteenth century. Again, in a living language common use is the primary determiner of correctness or (since you moved the goal posts) goodness. As an extreme case, a trans-gender person who does not identify as either male or female, or (even more extreme) identifies as non-gendered. Anther would be a corporate person. As a less extreme case when talking about a generic individual of indeterminate sex or in some cases gender, although I'm not sure if gendered pronouns in things like medical advice and products relating to sex specific items annoy trans-gendered people or not. "When the candidate is finished with the written exam, they should be directed to the physical examination room." You don't know the gender (presumably) of the candidate and because, logically, the sentence means "For all candidates, the candidate was directed to the physical examination room upon finishing the candidate's written exam.". Now one for you. 'Fix' this: Mary saw everyone before John noticed them. As for the other thing, that's pawsplay's beef not mine. Unlike pawsplay (making what I feel is a safe assumption here) I am not really a fan of gender-neutral English since in my personal experience it's often either a tool and justification to belittle others (Hello Professor Smithwicke! :) ) or (more typically) is stirring up annoyance over small things instead of addressing large issues. That said, if you are attempting to be unbiased in language you have two choices when you need a gender neutral pronoun. They or one stolen from another language. While English has a reputation for muggling other languages for vocabulary, it never really seems to take when it's intentionally done for this sort of thing. Mu hasn't caught on, for instance. However, I think you read pawsplay wrong. The interrogative responses showed bias. It would, barring knowledge not presented in the example, have been more correct and unbiased to use the epicene they in them because the interrogator (or interrogatrix) doesn't know the gender of the subject. As an aside, I think we need more gender specific titles. Words ending in -rix are fun. ;) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Alternative: Girls (females) in D&D/ Roleplaying
Top