Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Alternative Rules for Skill Challenges
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Matthias" data-source="post: 6124715" data-attributes="member: 3625"><p>For what it's worth, I like the notion of skill challenges, because there is only so much dramatic tension you can put into a single die roll. However, the implementation of 4E seemed to me unnecessarily complicated.</p><p></p><p>Here is a possible alternative method. Let's call them "dramatic skill checks".</p><p></p><p>Dramatic skill checks are intended to model tests of skill in certain high-tension situations, especially ones in which success or failure is not immediately known. Some good examples: a foot chase, a game of Chess or Go, an arm-wrestling match, navigating a maze or solving a puzzle under time constraints, attempting to manipulate an animal's attitude, and performing for an audience. Despite the name, these rules can also be used with ability checks, caster level checks, and so on.</p><p></p><p>A dramatic skill check consists of a series of individual skill checks using the same skill, made by the acting PC (or NPC), against a given DC; if this is an opposed check against another character, the opposing character also participates in the dramatic skill check. Dramatic skill checks are best used with any skill for which multiple retries are possible and overfailure (failing the prescribed DC by a certain minimum amount) does not impose a serious penalty on the character (such as falling due to an overfailed Climb check), and for situations in which the outcome is either total success or total failure, with no ties, "partial success," or mixed results possible.</p><p></p><p>To succeed on a dramatic skill check, a character must earn a certain number of points as determined by the GM, one point for each individual successful skill check. This minimum score is the Success Class (SC). One failure earns a negative point and cancels one success, so that the cumulative score might sway back and forth many times before the dramatic skill check is resolved.</p><p></p><p>Penalties from repetitive skill checks still apply. For example: penalties imposed on a retry due to a previous failure, and penalties that accumulate due to character fatigue or exhaustion.</p><p></p><p>Ordinarily, if the character earns enough negative points from failed checks to equal the SC of the dramatic skill check, then the character fails the entire dramatic skill check. Of course, the GM is free to define a separate "Failure Class" threshold for failing the dramatic skill check. If the GM wishes to use dramatic skill checks for skills that have dire consequences for overfailure, where an overfailed individual skill check would impose a penalty that makes it impossible for the character to continue, then overfailing an individual skill check could cause the character to automatically fail the dramatic skill check.</p><p></p><p>As a game mechanic, particularly when opposed checks are involved, dramatic skill checks function similarly to a "tug of war" in which the winner is the one who can bring the center of the rope across their finish line first.</p><p></p><p>The lowest possible Success Class for a dramatic skill check is 2. (In this sense, an ordinary skill check is simply a dramatic skill check with an SC of 1.) A Success Class of 3, 4, or even 5 points may be appropriate for increasing the tension of the situation. However, the GM should be mindful that if the acting PC or NPC has an odds of success approaching 50% against a given DC (i.e., the minimum roll on the d20 to succeed on the individual skill check falls within the range of 9-12), then the rate at which successes and failures with cancel each other out will be greater than normal.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Matthias, post: 6124715, member: 3625"] For what it's worth, I like the notion of skill challenges, because there is only so much dramatic tension you can put into a single die roll. However, the implementation of 4E seemed to me unnecessarily complicated. Here is a possible alternative method. Let's call them "dramatic skill checks". Dramatic skill checks are intended to model tests of skill in certain high-tension situations, especially ones in which success or failure is not immediately known. Some good examples: a foot chase, a game of Chess or Go, an arm-wrestling match, navigating a maze or solving a puzzle under time constraints, attempting to manipulate an animal's attitude, and performing for an audience. Despite the name, these rules can also be used with ability checks, caster level checks, and so on. A dramatic skill check consists of a series of individual skill checks using the same skill, made by the acting PC (or NPC), against a given DC; if this is an opposed check against another character, the opposing character also participates in the dramatic skill check. Dramatic skill checks are best used with any skill for which multiple retries are possible and overfailure (failing the prescribed DC by a certain minimum amount) does not impose a serious penalty on the character (such as falling due to an overfailed Climb check), and for situations in which the outcome is either total success or total failure, with no ties, "partial success," or mixed results possible. To succeed on a dramatic skill check, a character must earn a certain number of points as determined by the GM, one point for each individual successful skill check. This minimum score is the Success Class (SC). One failure earns a negative point and cancels one success, so that the cumulative score might sway back and forth many times before the dramatic skill check is resolved. Penalties from repetitive skill checks still apply. For example: penalties imposed on a retry due to a previous failure, and penalties that accumulate due to character fatigue or exhaustion. Ordinarily, if the character earns enough negative points from failed checks to equal the SC of the dramatic skill check, then the character fails the entire dramatic skill check. Of course, the GM is free to define a separate "Failure Class" threshold for failing the dramatic skill check. If the GM wishes to use dramatic skill checks for skills that have dire consequences for overfailure, where an overfailed individual skill check would impose a penalty that makes it impossible for the character to continue, then overfailing an individual skill check could cause the character to automatically fail the dramatic skill check. As a game mechanic, particularly when opposed checks are involved, dramatic skill checks function similarly to a "tug of war" in which the winner is the one who can bring the center of the rope across their finish line first. The lowest possible Success Class for a dramatic skill check is 2. (In this sense, an ordinary skill check is simply a dramatic skill check with an SC of 1.) A Success Class of 3, 4, or even 5 points may be appropriate for increasing the tension of the situation. However, the GM should be mindful that if the acting PC or NPC has an odds of success approaching 50% against a given DC (i.e., the minimum roll on the d20 to succeed on the individual skill check falls within the range of 9-12), then the rate at which successes and failures with cancel each other out will be greater than normal. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Alternative Rules for Skill Challenges
Top