Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Wisdom Penalty" data-source="post: 4161003" data-attributes="member: 13287">I'm with the OP on some levels.  With the funeral dirge of 3.5 playing the background, my group and I lost some wind in our sails for "real D&D" and tried out a few different systems.  I'm somewhat ashamed to admit this, but I had been a D&D monogamist since the time when Star Frontiers was a new game.  It was very, very refreshing to try a few different systems and different genres.Of course...D&D is still The One for me.  I'll be coming back once 4E is out.  If 4E stinks, I'll probably kick it back to 3.5E.  Pathfinder doesn't interest me (though I may pilfer some of their stuff), nor do the other and various systems that were mentioned.Um...I really don't have much of a point except to suggest that the OP (and others) that use their investment in 3.5 as a reason for not switching check out the definition of a sunk cost.From Wikipedia:In other words, it's considered irrational to base a future decision on a sunk cost.Sure, we all do it.  But looking at it that way may help swallow the bitter pill when you stare at your bookshelf and see all those dead and dying 3E books. It does for me. (And, hey - if you're not upset - there's more bargain basement 3E discounts on books out there than you can shake a stick at!)Wis</blockquote>