Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Alternatives to Human Ability Score Boosts
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ferratus" data-source="post: 5997711" data-attributes="member: 55966"><p>So a lot of people are having problems with the human ability score boost, because it seems to be at first glance OP (which it really isn't, as judged by my playtesting anyway) or because it means that humans will have better overall stats than their demi-human bretheren (which it does).</p><p></p><p>I think the main thing we have to remember is the designer's intentions. In this case, it is to give players the idea that humans are more skillful or adaptable without the use of feats, which some people don't want to use, and skills, which some people don't want to use. They want to keep a very basic game without customizable fiddly bits for people who don't want them. </p><p></p><p>But using an ability score bonus across the board is a bit of kludge, because it is alienating to some fans, particularly the Old School ones. They generally like the idea of humans who are ordinary with limitless potential. So they like their humans to have no class or level limits. </p><p></p><p>So my solutions is this. GIVE HUMANS A +10% XP BONUS. This combines the idea from 3e and 4e that humans are more skillful and adaptable than demi-humans, with the old school idea that humans more potential to rise above their demi-human peers.</p><p></p><p>With the flatter math, being a level or two ahead would be enticing because you get a new spell, combat ability, hp and damage, but you don't really pull ahead of your lower level peers in quite the same way. I think being slightly better at your class is balanced with the racial abilities that demi-humans get. Perhaps we'd have to give a +2 to an ability score of the player's choice still, but we shouldn't need to give +1 to all the rest.</p><p></p><p>Now this rule would be a problem with those who don' count XP, but I think it would be easy enough for those guys to simply allow the fighter to level up 1/2 way through the first adventure, and keep him one level above for the rest of the game.</p><p></p><p>That is my alternative. Critique it and suggest your own.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ferratus, post: 5997711, member: 55966"] So a lot of people are having problems with the human ability score boost, because it seems to be at first glance OP (which it really isn't, as judged by my playtesting anyway) or because it means that humans will have better overall stats than their demi-human bretheren (which it does). I think the main thing we have to remember is the designer's intentions. In this case, it is to give players the idea that humans are more skillful or adaptable without the use of feats, which some people don't want to use, and skills, which some people don't want to use. They want to keep a very basic game without customizable fiddly bits for people who don't want them. But using an ability score bonus across the board is a bit of kludge, because it is alienating to some fans, particularly the Old School ones. They generally like the idea of humans who are ordinary with limitless potential. So they like their humans to have no class or level limits. So my solutions is this. GIVE HUMANS A +10% XP BONUS. This combines the idea from 3e and 4e that humans are more skillful and adaptable than demi-humans, with the old school idea that humans more potential to rise above their demi-human peers. With the flatter math, being a level or two ahead would be enticing because you get a new spell, combat ability, hp and damage, but you don't really pull ahead of your lower level peers in quite the same way. I think being slightly better at your class is balanced with the racial abilities that demi-humans get. Perhaps we'd have to give a +2 to an ability score of the player's choice still, but we shouldn't need to give +1 to all the rest. Now this rule would be a problem with those who don' count XP, but I think it would be easy enough for those guys to simply allow the fighter to level up 1/2 way through the first adventure, and keep him one level above for the rest of the game. That is my alternative. Critique it and suggest your own. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Alternatives to Human Ability Score Boosts
Top