Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Alternatives to Human Ability Score Boosts
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Li Shenron" data-source="post: 5998074" data-attributes="member: 1465"><p>I'm not going to critique your proposal because I made the same in another thread <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p>But I want to elaborate on the section above from your post. I agree on the designer's intentions. OTOH I ask myself... how many groups are <em>really</em> not going to use skills and feats? Maybe I'm totally wrong, but IMHO the vast majority is going to use both. And the minority who is going to use neither skills nor feats looks like it will be comprised mostly of "old-schoolers". But how many of those old-schoolers are going to say "no skills in our game!" (which by the way in 5e are nothing but simple bonuses to some ability checks, not the large and complex subsystem of 3ed, so they are probably more acceptable now than before to an old-schooler) and "no feats in our game!" (feats being simple additional abilities) but are going to say "yes to super-humans with +1 to every score!"??? Why would a group of old-schoolers refuse to use skills and feats, but still play 5e with mandatory stuff like cantrips at-will, rituals at-will, expertise dice, sneak attack, turn undead as a spell, and a lot of other built-in details that have little to do with "old-school"? They'd rather not play 5e at all, but if they don't, it certainly won't be because of skills and feats... There are things in 5e which will make an old-schooler run away, and skills and feats are the <em>least</em> of them.</p><p></p><p>Therefore IMHO the groups who aren't going to use skills and feats are not really the old-schoolers' groups... they are more likely going to be <em>beginners'</em> groups which choose to play their first campaigns with the smaller number of options so that it's a bit easier. If they get hooked in the game, skills and feats are <strong>much</strong> easier to learn (skills = flat bonuses! feats = simple add-ons abilities!) and use than the expertise dice or the sorcerer's willpower mechanic or other class-specific features that by default <em>cannot</em> be removed, therefore the same beginners groups most likely they <em>will</em> later use skills and feats.</p><p></p><p>All this to say that IMHO the best thing to do (since I am myself uneasy with the XP bonus idea, even tho I suggested it) is <strong><u>just give Humans bonus skills and feats</u></strong>.</p><p></p><p>Then put a nice sidebar which says "if your group doesn't use skills or feats, consider the following alternative bonuses to Humans" and propose the +1 to all abilities, an XP bonus alternative, and even something else.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Li Shenron, post: 5998074, member: 1465"] I'm not going to critique your proposal because I made the same in another thread ;) But I want to elaborate on the section above from your post. I agree on the designer's intentions. OTOH I ask myself... how many groups are [I]really[/I] not going to use skills and feats? Maybe I'm totally wrong, but IMHO the vast majority is going to use both. And the minority who is going to use neither skills nor feats looks like it will be comprised mostly of "old-schoolers". But how many of those old-schoolers are going to say "no skills in our game!" (which by the way in 5e are nothing but simple bonuses to some ability checks, not the large and complex subsystem of 3ed, so they are probably more acceptable now than before to an old-schooler) and "no feats in our game!" (feats being simple additional abilities) but are going to say "yes to super-humans with +1 to every score!"??? Why would a group of old-schoolers refuse to use skills and feats, but still play 5e with mandatory stuff like cantrips at-will, rituals at-will, expertise dice, sneak attack, turn undead as a spell, and a lot of other built-in details that have little to do with "old-school"? They'd rather not play 5e at all, but if they don't, it certainly won't be because of skills and feats... There are things in 5e which will make an old-schooler run away, and skills and feats are the [I]least[/I] of them. Therefore IMHO the groups who aren't going to use skills and feats are not really the old-schoolers' groups... they are more likely going to be [I]beginners'[/I] groups which choose to play their first campaigns with the smaller number of options so that it's a bit easier. If they get hooked in the game, skills and feats are [B]much[/B] easier to learn (skills = flat bonuses! feats = simple add-ons abilities!) and use than the expertise dice or the sorcerer's willpower mechanic or other class-specific features that by default [I]cannot[/I] be removed, therefore the same beginners groups most likely they [I]will[/I] later use skills and feats. All this to say that IMHO the best thing to do (since I am myself uneasy with the XP bonus idea, even tho I suggested it) is [B][U]just give Humans bonus skills and feats[/U][/B]. Then put a nice sidebar which says "if your group doesn't use skills or feats, consider the following alternative bonuses to Humans" and propose the +1 to all abilities, an XP bonus alternative, and even something else. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Alternatives to Human Ability Score Boosts
Top