Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Alternity 2e Wish List
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="evildmguy" data-source="post: 5326119" data-attributes="member: 6092"><p>No no no no no no no no no no. No. </p><p></p><p>The problem with this, higher is better, is that you no longer have an upper limit. This creates problems for d20 starting around level 18 and getting worse in Epic. Further, for drama purposes, the game keeps increasing the DCs of skills for higher level characters. Yet, it's the same task. The reason they do this, though, is to keep that chance for failure. </p><p></p><p>In other words, climbing starts as a DC 10 but slowly increases with level so that there is always a chance of failure. Hopefully its a slowly decreasing chance of failure but while this works for drama, the system now doesn't work for itself because the same task is different DCs. </p><p></p><p>In Alternity, by having lower is better, you can have upper limits. Further, you get to a point where they are so good that you can see that one more skill rank doesn't help. It's the rank benefits that matter more. </p><p></p><p>Sorry but this is one of those things that I thought Alternity did very well and would not want to see changed. I am find with the dice modifiers being different or whatever but not the overall idea of it. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Sorry, not following some of this. Which is an elegant system? Higher equals better? I disagree. In Alternity, you say that skill checks are low but you want rolls based on the results of those checks high. That takes care of it and explains it all. Still one sentence and just as elegant. </p><p></p><p>Again, I'm not sure you are realizing the point of the modifiers. If you are, I apologize for the following explanation. </p><p></p><p>If I tell a DND player that they have to roll a d20 and add 10, without knowing the DC of the roll, that could be good or bad or anything in between. Let's say they said they wanted to attack a creature. Without knowing its AC, the player doesn't know if this is good or bad. (Assuming a new player who doesn't know the AC or understand levels completely.) </p><p></p><p>Now, think about Alternity. A player says they want to attack with a weapon they know their character isn't good with. I tell them low is better but to pick up a d20 and a d12, roll them, and ADD them together. It doesn't take a math genius to realize, for the player AND character, that this isn't a good idea. So, instead, they say they want to attack with a weapon the character is good with but have to run and get it. Sure, they have a slight penalty for running but now it's roll a d20 and d4 and add them together. Again, it doesn't take a math genius to realize this is better for the odds. </p><p></p><p>Essentially, the dice were a hint how good or bad of a chance they had. I had many players, when we were playing, look at what they had to add together and rethink what they were going to do to have better odds. Sure, the character wouldn't have that time to think but for the game it worked out well. Once in a while, they might take the shot with the +5 die penalty to see if it works but most of the time they waited or did something to reduce that penalty. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>In some ways, I can't argue with this. It is a big range to roll a d20. I completely agree. Further, rolling a one on a d20 in Alternity sucked when even the d4 rolled a 4 and potentially pushed an Amazing result at least to a Good and maybe an Ordinary result. </p><p></p><p>What I can say, though, is that odds for at least an ordinary result were good and that's a good thing. I can't stress that enough. Do NOT take away from Ordinary successes. They are still a success. For a while there, we wanted to see Good or better successes and I think that really pulled from the Ordinary, which is still a success. </p><p></p><p>Further, since I wanted a more heroic feel, that heroic flavor is in the ordinary successes in that they keep the battle going longer and aren't as deadly as the Good or Amazing results. </p><p></p><p>You might understand all of this about the Alternity system and if so, I apologize for the long winded answer. But I think these are important points and central to how Alternity worked and worked well.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="evildmguy, post: 5326119, member: 6092"] No no no no no no no no no no. No. The problem with this, higher is better, is that you no longer have an upper limit. This creates problems for d20 starting around level 18 and getting worse in Epic. Further, for drama purposes, the game keeps increasing the DCs of skills for higher level characters. Yet, it's the same task. The reason they do this, though, is to keep that chance for failure. In other words, climbing starts as a DC 10 but slowly increases with level so that there is always a chance of failure. Hopefully its a slowly decreasing chance of failure but while this works for drama, the system now doesn't work for itself because the same task is different DCs. In Alternity, by having lower is better, you can have upper limits. Further, you get to a point where they are so good that you can see that one more skill rank doesn't help. It's the rank benefits that matter more. Sorry but this is one of those things that I thought Alternity did very well and would not want to see changed. I am find with the dice modifiers being different or whatever but not the overall idea of it. Sorry, not following some of this. Which is an elegant system? Higher equals better? I disagree. In Alternity, you say that skill checks are low but you want rolls based on the results of those checks high. That takes care of it and explains it all. Still one sentence and just as elegant. Again, I'm not sure you are realizing the point of the modifiers. If you are, I apologize for the following explanation. If I tell a DND player that they have to roll a d20 and add 10, without knowing the DC of the roll, that could be good or bad or anything in between. Let's say they said they wanted to attack a creature. Without knowing its AC, the player doesn't know if this is good or bad. (Assuming a new player who doesn't know the AC or understand levels completely.) Now, think about Alternity. A player says they want to attack with a weapon they know their character isn't good with. I tell them low is better but to pick up a d20 and a d12, roll them, and ADD them together. It doesn't take a math genius to realize, for the player AND character, that this isn't a good idea. So, instead, they say they want to attack with a weapon the character is good with but have to run and get it. Sure, they have a slight penalty for running but now it's roll a d20 and d4 and add them together. Again, it doesn't take a math genius to realize this is better for the odds. Essentially, the dice were a hint how good or bad of a chance they had. I had many players, when we were playing, look at what they had to add together and rethink what they were going to do to have better odds. Sure, the character wouldn't have that time to think but for the game it worked out well. Once in a while, they might take the shot with the +5 die penalty to see if it works but most of the time they waited or did something to reduce that penalty. In some ways, I can't argue with this. It is a big range to roll a d20. I completely agree. Further, rolling a one on a d20 in Alternity sucked when even the d4 rolled a 4 and potentially pushed an Amazing result at least to a Good and maybe an Ordinary result. What I can say, though, is that odds for at least an ordinary result were good and that's a good thing. I can't stress that enough. Do NOT take away from Ordinary successes. They are still a success. For a while there, we wanted to see Good or better successes and I think that really pulled from the Ordinary, which is still a success. Further, since I wanted a more heroic feel, that heroic flavor is in the ordinary successes in that they keep the battle going longer and aren't as deadly as the Good or Amazing results. You might understand all of this about the Alternity system and if so, I apologize for the long winded answer. But I think these are important points and central to how Alternity worked and worked well. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Alternity 2e Wish List
Top