Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Always with the killing
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ariosto" data-source="post: 5299808" data-attributes="member: 80487"><p>I for one do not believe that "role play" happens only in activities other than combat.</p><p></p><p>However, if you do not believe that making lots of combat a quick end to a character's career tends to lead to less combat, then either</p><p>(A) you are basically calling those of us who speak from experience something or other, or</p><p>(B) you are missing the point of your own statement that</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Look: If players see killing and looting as its own sufficient reward, to the extent that they do not give a hill of beans about their characters <strong>surviving</strong> -- much less succeeding to attain more prestige -- then obviously getting their characters killed will not dissuade them.</p><p></p><p>Here's a really fundamental thing:</p><p><strong>If you want a game that's not always with the killing, then you want players who want a game that''s not always with the killing.</strong></p><p></p><p>Otherwise, the most that trying to pressure the fire-and-hackers to play something else is likely to accomplish is to make them unhappy enough with your "badwrongfun" attitude to say, "Hasta la vista, baby."</p><p></p><p>Players who don't care about "solving problems" are not the target!</p><p></p><p>On the other hand, if the problem is how to survive and succeed in a society that can fill <em>you</em> with bullets (or hang, electrocute, gas, inject with poison, incarcerate, enslave, anathematize, lobotomize, or otherwise interfere with your career plans), then the situation is different.</p><p></p><p>The most pragmatic solutions to a lot of problems do <em>not</em> involve acting like a sociopath. So, the question of what the problems are -- <em>where the game is</em> -- is very basic.</p><p></p><p>People who are game players, who have come to the affair to play a game well, are motivated to adopt whatever strategies are effective. The very first step is to learn the victory conditions. In most popular RPGs, as in many arcade games, there is no set end point. There is opportunity to score points (either literally, as in D&D, or not) until a character is removed from play. Avoiding that event is up to the player, and is a key element of skill that permits the attainment of high scores.</p><p></p><p>The effect of old D&D awarding few points (especially from Supp. I on) for killing, while the clear object is securing treasures, has been much remarked upon. I think AD&D's equation of treasure with literally "cashing in" has made for a lot of trouble among people who get stuck grinding an ax about "money grubbing".</p><p></p><p>Peace among nations can be a treasure, or a good marriage -- a great many things that may have a high "cash value" partly because people who have them are loathe to give them up.</p><p></p><p><strong>In my experience, the single biggest contributing factor to pace of combat operations in D&D and similar games is hit points.</strong> Characters fight a lot because they <em>can</em> fight a lot. First-level characters in old D&D are likely to be dead after very few hits. A Fighter Lord has "nine lives" even before figuring in magical healing resources.</p><p></p><p><strong>Traveller</strong> is, short of the "universal systems", about the most wide-open game around in the sense that it is up to players to choose whatever "scoring" system them may desire. That there are no built-in goals makes it a bit more like the "game" of real life. The whole field of science fiction is open, all its utopias and dystopias and everything in between. It may be best suited to those for whom exploration itself is the greatest reward.</p><p></p><p>However, there is also a strong military-SF and war-gaming element. Traveller characters tend not to get killed in one shot, but two hits often do it. The first shot might knock them out, which can actually be a saving grace as "nature's way of telling you" that it's time for Plan B.</p><p></p><p>In my experience, that is about perfect for a setup that involves</p><p>(A) long-term character development, and</p><p>(B) a fair amount of combat, but</p><p>(C) an attitude toward combat somewhere between a real soldier's and a comic-book character's, tending more toward the former than in games that make getting beaten, shot or stabbed trivial.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ariosto, post: 5299808, member: 80487"] I for one do not believe that "role play" happens only in activities other than combat. However, if you do not believe that making lots of combat a quick end to a character's career tends to lead to less combat, then either (A) you are basically calling those of us who speak from experience something or other, or (B) you are missing the point of your own statement that Look: If players see killing and looting as its own sufficient reward, to the extent that they do not give a hill of beans about their characters [b]surviving[/b] -- much less succeeding to attain more prestige -- then obviously getting their characters killed will not dissuade them. Here's a really fundamental thing: [b]If you want a game that's not always with the killing, then you want players who want a game that''s not always with the killing.[/b] Otherwise, the most that trying to pressure the fire-and-hackers to play something else is likely to accomplish is to make them unhappy enough with your "badwrongfun" attitude to say, "Hasta la vista, baby." Players who don't care about "solving problems" are not the target! On the other hand, if the problem is how to survive and succeed in a society that can fill [i]you[/i] with bullets (or hang, electrocute, gas, inject with poison, incarcerate, enslave, anathematize, lobotomize, or otherwise interfere with your career plans), then the situation is different. The most pragmatic solutions to a lot of problems do [i]not[/i] involve acting like a sociopath. So, the question of what the problems are -- [i]where the game is[/i] -- is very basic. People who are game players, who have come to the affair to play a game well, are motivated to adopt whatever strategies are effective. The very first step is to learn the victory conditions. In most popular RPGs, as in many arcade games, there is no set end point. There is opportunity to score points (either literally, as in D&D, or not) until a character is removed from play. Avoiding that event is up to the player, and is a key element of skill that permits the attainment of high scores. The effect of old D&D awarding few points (especially from Supp. I on) for killing, while the clear object is securing treasures, has been much remarked upon. I think AD&D's equation of treasure with literally "cashing in" has made for a lot of trouble among people who get stuck grinding an ax about "money grubbing". Peace among nations can be a treasure, or a good marriage -- a great many things that may have a high "cash value" partly because people who have them are loathe to give them up. [b]In my experience, the single biggest contributing factor to pace of combat operations in D&D and similar games is hit points.[/b] Characters fight a lot because they [i]can[/i] fight a lot. First-level characters in old D&D are likely to be dead after very few hits. A Fighter Lord has "nine lives" even before figuring in magical healing resources. [b]Traveller[/b] is, short of the "universal systems", about the most wide-open game around in the sense that it is up to players to choose whatever "scoring" system them may desire. That there are no built-in goals makes it a bit more like the "game" of real life. The whole field of science fiction is open, all its utopias and dystopias and everything in between. It may be best suited to those for whom exploration itself is the greatest reward. However, there is also a strong military-SF and war-gaming element. Traveller characters tend not to get killed in one shot, but two hits often do it. The first shot might knock them out, which can actually be a saving grace as "nature's way of telling you" that it's time for Plan B. In my experience, that is about perfect for a setup that involves (A) long-term character development, and (B) a fair amount of combat, but (C) an attitude toward combat somewhere between a real soldier's and a comic-book character's, tending more toward the former than in games that make getting beaten, shot or stabbed trivial. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Always with the killing
Top