Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="fusangite" data-source="post: 1892351" data-attributes="member: 7240">swrushing,I think it is unfortunate that while you are willing to continue this debate you will not actually respond to the central issue here. In previous posts, you seemed to articulate the view that if a player blamed his GM for not having a good time at the game, that this blame must have been reasonably applied. In two iterations of messages, I attempted to get you to confirm that this was your position. It seemed to me that you did indeed confirm this. It now appears, in part due to some imprecise language on my part, for which I happily accept blame, that this is not, in fact, your position. Although I do not anticipate that we will reach full agreement, I continue to hold out the hope that we can, at least, determine the precise nature of our disagreement. I therefore appeal to you to answer two questions that I hope will offer some clarity:1. Do you believe that a player who blames their GM for their non-enjoyment of a session is always correct in assessing blame? (I'm anticipating that you will answer "no" but I want to check.)2. If you do indeed acknowledge that it is possible for a player to unreasonably or unjustifiably blame their GM for their non-enjoyment of a session, what are some reasonable tests for determining how reasonable the player's opinion is?</blockquote>