Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Am I reading something wrong or is Tempest fighter just better?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Morgan_Scott82" data-source="post: 4562125" data-attributes="member: 79594"><p>So I'm typing this on a break at the office and don't have my books with me if I make an error please point it out.</p><p> </p><p>That said it occured to me the other day that the tempest fighter gives up absolutely nothing (I know they give up Fighter Weapon Talent, but they get back exactly the same bonus and then some).</p><p> </p><p>Tempest Technique gives you a +1 to attack with weapons with the off hand property, the Two weapon defense feat and a +1 to damage if they're in light armor or chainmail, this bonus increases to plus two with weapons that have the offhand property.</p><p> </p><p>I believe the designers thinking was that the damage bonus was to make up the typically lower damage of weapons with the off hand property, and the sacrifice in AC.</p><p> </p><p>However with the right choice of weapon you effectively give up nothing.</p><p> </p><p>Using any of the double weapons in AV, makes this a no brainer. All double weapons have the off-hand, and defensive property. The defensive property gives you a +1 unnamed bonus to AC, combine this with the +1 shield bonus for two weapon defense, you've totally made up the gap between the chain armor the tempest fighter will be using and the scale armor + shield the regular fighter will be using. The +1 to hit from Fighter weapon talent is made up by the +1 to hit with weapons that have the off hand property.</p><p> </p><p>Therefore mechanically speaking there is little reason for a fighter to not be a tempest fighter.</p><p> </p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Equivilent AC</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Equivilent Attack bonuses</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Equivilent base weapon damage (double weapons provide off hand weapons at d8, d10 and d12)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">+3 bonus damage (+2 unnamed bonus from tempest technique, and an additional +1 feat bonus from two weapon fighting)</li> </ul><p>Have I missed something or is the combination of Tempest Technique and the Double weapons from AV, just mechanically superior to PHB fighters?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Morgan_Scott82, post: 4562125, member: 79594"] So I'm typing this on a break at the office and don't have my books with me if I make an error please point it out. That said it occured to me the other day that the tempest fighter gives up absolutely nothing (I know they give up Fighter Weapon Talent, but they get back exactly the same bonus and then some). Tempest Technique gives you a +1 to attack with weapons with the off hand property, the Two weapon defense feat and a +1 to damage if they're in light armor or chainmail, this bonus increases to plus two with weapons that have the offhand property. I believe the designers thinking was that the damage bonus was to make up the typically lower damage of weapons with the off hand property, and the sacrifice in AC. However with the right choice of weapon you effectively give up nothing. Using any of the double weapons in AV, makes this a no brainer. All double weapons have the off-hand, and defensive property. The defensive property gives you a +1 unnamed bonus to AC, combine this with the +1 shield bonus for two weapon defense, you've totally made up the gap between the chain armor the tempest fighter will be using and the scale armor + shield the regular fighter will be using. The +1 to hit from Fighter weapon talent is made up by the +1 to hit with weapons that have the off hand property. Therefore mechanically speaking there is little reason for a fighter to not be a tempest fighter. [LIST] [*]Equivilent AC [*]Equivilent Attack bonuses [*]Equivilent base weapon damage (double weapons provide off hand weapons at d8, d10 and d12) [*]+3 bonus damage (+2 unnamed bonus from tempest technique, and an additional +1 feat bonus from two weapon fighting) [/LIST]Have I missed something or is the combination of Tempest Technique and the Double weapons from AV, just mechanically superior to PHB fighters? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Am I reading something wrong or is Tempest fighter just better?
Top